WEBXPERIENCE.ORG : Is using "no-follow" Tags on Listings, Why ?

Discussion in 'Directories' started by accurate, Sep 8, 2006.

  1. ! Ask !

    ! Ask ! Peon

    Messages:
    3,282
    Likes Received:
    260
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #21
    Google follows the “nofollow” links :) it only doesn’t count for PR.
     
    ! Ask !, Sep 13, 2006 IP
  2. Cristian Mezei

    Cristian Mezei Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,332
    Likes Received:
    355
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    213
    #22
    We do NOT use nofollow on listings. I am so amased that none of the posters here really took the 2 seconds to even look at the website.

    We only use nofollow on redundant links. Please DO look at the website, and see what I mean.

    He didn't spent time on it actually. I just searched our entire mailing database, and didn't found any e-mail realted to any "nofollow" word.

    Maybe our mail server had problems right in that period, and we didn't got the e-mail, because I can tell you that we at least READ all the e-mails that are not spam.
     
    Cristian Mezei, Oct 3, 2006 IP
  3. yfs1

    yfs1 User Title Not Found

    Messages:
    13,798
    Likes Received:
    922
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #23
    Actually we did and gave the same answer you did...He just didn't want to listen

    I meant on this thread (look at the posting times)
     
    yfs1, Oct 4, 2006 IP
  4. Cristian Mezei

    Cristian Mezei Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,332
    Likes Received:
    355
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    213
    #24
    I hate that. People are just not careful enough :(
     
    Cristian Mezei, Oct 4, 2006 IP
  5. Blogmaster

    Blogmaster Blood Type Dating Affiliate Manager

    Messages:
    25,924
    Likes Received:
    1,354
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    380
    #25
    I have a few listings in that directory and highly recommend it. The premium listings are $30 and $30 very well spent :)
     
    Blogmaster, Oct 4, 2006 IP