Is articles re-writer good to use. Like article spinner or The best article spinner. How do you guys review it? Is it readable to users? I have just used article spinner as a test to see if it passes copyscape and it did. So how good is to use spinners. Lets discuss. Thanks
Article rewriting is good, I personally use magic article rewriter and I love it. There is no such thing as automated article spinners, you do have to go back and make sure it makes sense. That means removing synonyms or words that cause the sentences to be unreadable. I have a vast database of synonyms so it takes me one click to spin an article and about 15 minutes to proofread, but the results are hundreds of unique versions and more relevant backlinks. In essence, more unique backlinks, equals higher search engine rankings...works well for me.
It's also about your linguistic skills. If you don't know how to work with synonyms, search engines can easily find the cheat. I guess so.
Eh...I've tried various article spinners, but often the proof reading can take almost as long as just writing from scratch imho. If you're following bum marketing remember you're not trying to create prose-the goal is to write 'quickly.'
i personally use the best spinner when i have to do article marketing i prefer outsourcing when i need good quality articles
HI Aj845, another alternative to articlespinners is the possibility to let others rewrite the articles. You could hire someone from elance to rewrite your articles for 1 dollars in plain english. regards, LASSE
Article Re-Writing is not bad and saves a lot time to us but to do so i have never used any tool. I do it manually as i can write an article that makes sense to me, what i require.
Well i can tell you that i get great results with The best spinner.. If you take your time and do it word for word you can get an amazing amount of highly unique readable posts.. Deep spinning is the key. If you know then what to do with them you can get yourself an army of great backlinks
If you are spinning your articles you should be doing it by sentence, then the synonyms. Its not good enough to just change the synonyms.
Original content cant be spun...try as you might...you are wasting time...no wonder ezinearticles are nazis now about getting an article submitted lol...coincides with the release of this type of thing on clickbank.
Article Spinner is a good Tool. however, you cannot just depend 100% on it. Sometimes, you have to check the language or vocabulary is making sense with no grammar mistake.
I sometimes incorporate article rewriting in my blogs but I usually get a live member to do this. They are able to help you and you can be sure that the quality is above exceptional. I never personally tried these machines to do this.
OP: I have never used an article spinner, but I have a good grasp of the language that I write in. I go line by line - reordering phrases, using synonyms, and flipping ideas within the paragraphs. Process usually takes about 15 minutes p/article - and it always works out well. Passing copyscape is one thing, but if your article makes no sense - there's a problem. Regards, -e
I have a spinner I use that I got with another program, and it works pretty well. I agree with "juvenanexecne". You need to spin entire sentences; not just synonyms. Plus, it makes your article readable...
LOL! hmm...If it works then they invented artificial intelligence. Frankly, Its just a bad innovation, if everyone was using this sort of thing, the internet would be retarded. If you're going to resort to this to get traffic and backlinks you may as well use other methods like social networking or backllnk building. Its just pointless online graffiti. If you want to target a certain keyword, and you are stuck writing multiple articles for that same topic, you can create articles with different points, different emphasis, but they will all be unique, original and valuable. Spinning will just decline your webkarma...yes this does exist. Give value and you will be recompensed...deplete value and you got nothing in your karma bank.