Filefactory Pays

@gacon_svn, were you mirroring links?

 

yes . what's the matter ?

 

just wanted to know if they will deny payments even if we dont mirror links!

 

and if i earn more money and mirror link . we never paid me >"<

 

Hello please reply to that email and give an proper explanation.They might re-consider these.

 

very bad . we dont' paid for me . i lost 100$ . may be when i choose play filefactory is big mistake

 

may be i should choose filesonic

 

Did you contact them via email??And given explanation??

 

i contacted them . because i mirror link . and they didn't paid . . oh my money

 

Good News for all...We are in the process of removing Rule No 5(removing mirroring rule).Stay tune will post it here.

 

wow... thats great. i really hope there isnt any catch!

and i just removed all some of my popular files which were mirrored!

 

very good but if i haven't received my money . i never use filefactory for my file >"<

 

A lot of you are very upset with the rules of our Rewards program. We cannot simply pay for all downloads if you are
sharing files at our current Reward program's rates, because quite simply, it's too expensive. We are trying to think of
changes to the program that will allow you to still earn rewards even if you want to mirror files, while rewarding
members who generate sales more - because while we value everyone uploading, the ones that make sales pay for the Rewards, servers
bandwidth, etc, for everyone else who doesn't.

If we did this, we would possibly be able to remove the mirroring rule, because people that mirror a lot will earn a maximum of $5
per 1,000 downloads - unless we had them on Commission, and if we did, then they'd at least earn 50% of any sales they make.

Anyway, here is our idea so far. These numbers are very rough, and we have not yet performed reports on our current program to figure
out what the ratios should be, so these are NOT OFFICIAL and are COMPLETELY FOR THE PURPOSE OF GETTING FEEDBACK:

Step 1:
If the sale revenue is greater than the reward earnings over the last 7 days, they automatically go into the "Amazing" category below.

Step 2:
If the sale revenue is less than the reward earnings over the last 7 days, they get classified according to the following criteria:

Amazing: More than 1 sale per 1,000 downloads =
40% commission on sales, normal DL rates
Great: More than 1 sale per 2,500 downloads =
25% Commission on sales, normal DL Rates
Standard: More than 1 sale per 10,000 downloads =
10% Commission on sales, normal DL Rates
Poor: Less than 1 sale per 10,000 downloads =
20% Commission on sales, Group "D" Rates
Commission: Set on a case-by-case basis =
50% Commission on sales, No DL Rates

The rates will remain the same. Everybody is currently in the "Standard" category, so that will give you an idea of what would change.


Please post your review with these..

 

may be very bad . i think old rules don't have rule 5 is good >"< . a lot of people like me don't make money via download and no sale and if have this rule . they are poor

 

removing rule no.5 is a positive move

 

i lost 100$ because rule no.5 . they didn't paid

 

In order so satisfy all(we try at least) we are trying something new and so only we are asking your feedback with new reward rule update...

 

and i lose 100$ . i earn 2 month and they don't paid me because a stupid rule

 

check you private message

 

haven't received pm from you