Thanks for that, seriously, I don't think I have ever heard any funnier or sadder shit than this: No, God's Penis is not a biological organ. I never said God's Penis was the same as man's penis. Obviously it wouldn't be. That is why I pointed out God has a Holy, Righteous Penis. That is to say, it's not the same as man's corrupted, fleshy one. As I said when this subject first came up, once again: Penises are not just for sex & peeing. It is only because man is evil that he thinks of penises exclusively in those terms. Man is made in the image of God the Father. That is the primary reason why man has a penis. You cannot insert your evil prejudicial ideas of man's penis onto God - which is exactly what you are doing. God's Penis is not equal to man's penis. It's really not hard to understand. IQ estimate: 22
"...You cannot insert your evil prejudicial ideas of man's penis onto God..." LOL. Of course, you know they are only going to publish the most over the top, craziest quotes they can possibly find? I thought this one was funny... Ha Ha...
LOL. "The very first human intercourse was a rape, women have a hymen. Every intercourse after that is still a "rape" because women still have hymens. Women are not supposed to be poked by men, they were all lesbians until one day a freak of nature was born and he got saddled with "God". All men are women first when they develop in the womb, they just have overgrown clits. Female ejaculation contains trace amounts of semen and that's how the ancient female reproductive system reproduced before men "raped" them. In essence, all sex is rape. Am I going to complain? No, I have a gun to shoot down any "rapist" that enters my home. " "[about indigenous populations] How is it that when the Spaniards, the French, the Portuguese, and the British went to colonise different islands around the world? How would the people have gotten there if there were no airplanes? The distances would have been too far for that many people to take a boat, so how did they get there? Did the land masses just "magically" move, such as your flawed theory of plate techtonics says? Did humans once have wings and then lose them through "natural selection"? If you can't answer this, then there is no other logical explaination than God did it and that Jesus Christ is the Lord. "
I wrote about this subject. It might be too lengthy to post in here, but you can visit my site to read it. http://ldcarter.com/?p=25
"Some things can not be explained by science. Take for example, rainbows. Rainbows are a mystery and you can not touch them, just like god. Despite this fact, they are still there even though there is no scientific explanation for them. So next time you find yourself doubting your faith, think of god as a rainbow. I know that this can be a difficult concept for some of you to grasp. It is just like air you can't see it but you know its there"
Interesting article of which I cannot find fault. I hope, however, along your journey you don't fall to the same moral ills those you appear to admire so much, did.
Three hundred and eighty seven posts in this thread and some people still don't believe that I exist.
Why everyone arguing so much.God does exist and it is only a matter of perception that makes poeple think god in different ways
Humans created God, God only exists inside your mind because without humans thinking there is a God, God simply wouldn't exist as no other creature observes there being a God.
ya i believe in god. . .god exist in this world. .everything needs a source for its begining. .and god is that source for tis world
What's the source of god? What's the source of the source of god? I guess because you've based your belief on endless hours of research and not just plain old ignorance that you'll know what the source of the source of the source of god is too right?