That's our stats at imagespacemedia.com Anyone have better luck? We are about to switch to gumgum. $0.01 eCPM is just horible.
Hello mememe. I had same issue but I found out that Image Space Media calculates eCPM differently than standard ad networks. It is not impressions on page level but image level. I have a wall paper site that has so many images on one page, therefore I have a lower eCPM than just the banner ad that counts only page views not image views. GumGum is terrible. IMHO
they've made me an offer since we have so many impressions. But what I want to see more importantly is a limit to the max # of in-image ads per page. I hate the flooding of in-images ads. On pages with all these ads (impressions) that won't be clicked anyway just seems annoying. A lot more focus needs to be placed on quality positioning of ads. That will also attract more advertisers and more importantly keep their business and as a result increase payout to publishers.
I have tried both imagespacemedia.com and GumGum, comparatively GumGum ads looks better on images than the other competitors. Its not like I am promoting them, I am providing my little study. Try Gumgum for a week and see the difference accordingly to yourself or else fix a minimum eCPM, because that the thing that matters the most since you have such good impressions per day. All the best
I ran Gumgum is something is wrong. They don't even record all my clicks even with the low CPC rates.
So where are you now between the two? I'm also looking into both these networks, but Gumgum's page view count looks wrong, and Image Space's code doesn't work 100% of the time.