Sorry.. your weak excuses aren't good ones. 10 months is plenty of time to do something about this big bad threat to america that your whining clinton didn't do enough about. Rather than do anything about the terror threat, bush was busy playing oil buddies with the terrorists' families
Hmm, eight years to take action, ten months to take action. Eighty months....ten months. Blind hatred and/or excuses?
This big bad threat that yo-yo thinks is made up, right? I mean, if you believe the government did the 1993 WTC bombings and the 2001 attacks; and if you are okay with attacks off US soil; its curious why you attack Bush for doing nothing. What was there to do, in your mind?
HUH? Are you suggesting that Bush would have taken action if not for 911? Even you can't get away with that crap. Please, it may look good in numbers, but it's pure bullshit.
Truth hurts. Yep, he won just like Tyson won. Biting his ear. Seem to be the case more often than not. Yes, he did just as well as one would expect when confronted with the truth. Poor guy. I feel so sorry for him.
Now to be fair that is not entirely true. He did manage to take money from hard working Americans. But he did not stop there. He took some hard working Americans to the cleaners by not only taking everything they earned from them while he was on his tax and spend fits, but also retroactively took money they earned under Bush senior. Yes, he made great strides. I especially respect all he and his wife did with health care... Sorry, I am laughing too hard to write any more.
What's the matter? Trying to distract away from the point isn't going to work. Bush had 9 or 10 months to do something about the threat of terror and OBL. But he did nothing and 9/11 was the price we paid for it. Got it? 10 months, no action, no nothing, 9/11. With cheerleader boy as president.
But, again, yo, the government did 9/11, remember? they also did the 93 attacks, remember? I fail to see how you make any of these connections.
Right. The point is, blind hatred. Eighty months vs ten months. Three times let go, no times let go. What happens after the WTC is hit under Clinton's watch? What happens when embassies, the USS Cole and others are hit? Nothing. What happens when WTC is hit under Bush (while planned on Clinton's watch?) Bush goes after bin laden and terrorists around the world. On one hand, you are upset because he does, on the other, want to suggest he does nothing.
Only when he thinks he can make it Bush's fault. Two extremely differing positions with one commonality. Blind hatred for a president. Only the message matters.
I guess Clinton didn't get the memo when he talked openly about letting him go: http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/9/10/181819.shtml?s=tn Complete with audio. Straight from the horsies mouth, himself. Hmm, who should I believe? The horse, or the pony?
Woulda been easier to copy and paste this from truthout; but if volume makes up for intelligence, you have a point Aren't these the same financial dealings that you are currently opposed to, yo-yo? Fundamental discongruity still unanswered
lorien if you'd stop attacking my personal beliefs and start debating the facts at hand, you might get some where. I can debate any side of any event i want regardless of my own beliefs. Do you have any substance to add to the matters at hand or are you just going to continue on your useless uninformative path of saying nothing about nothing?
Right, only the message matters. Whether it's your beliefs or someone elses, as long as it blames Bush, only the message matters. Thanks for confirming what we all knew
So, you think it makes total sense to complain about inaction for aggressions that you think never happened? And complain that "right wingers" were opposed to things that you are also now opposed to as well? You are simply not making any sense here, which is normal and typical. Conviction is a wonderful thing, isn't it?
or mental masturbation. wonder if he is gonna write clinton a letter for this "happy ending" only to a leftist, is reminding them what they believe, an "attack"
I found it interesting that Chris Wallace just moments ago in an interview said that after the interview he tried to shake Clinton's hand and Clinton apparently went balistic yelling at his staff, his press secretary, etc. Wallace said "Clinton was angry" and out of control. Acting like child. At one point during the interview Clinton's press secretary was pushing and poking Wallace's producer telling him to end the interview. Wallace went on to say that "hey, I struck a nerve". Yep, that he did. I bet there are quite a few people out there who are embarrased that they ever voted for Clinton. Truth hurts.