No, that is different. I WAS an editor. She never was. See the difference? And again, you can bring up my edit count all ya want too... and you all know WHY I left, so if I get sensitive its only because editors are giving lies as to the cause of my leaving or they are insinuating I've broken a rule. ya see... unlike many of the editors that post here, I have morals and stand up to them. If you could say the same, you'd also be claiming to be an ex-editor. And just so everyone else knows I quit so was not kicked out... so thanks for once again proving that it's not me that is the one being misleading... it's YOU and her.
I have to say that you did leave, Q. I remember it well. But DMOZ usually replies to re-applications very quickly, strange about yours.
I do apologise Q. My using the term "kicked out" was incorrect, you did in fact choose to leave before that could happen.
You must have heard about it here... as you certainly didn't hear about it from the inside of the ODP seeings as you are NOT and were NOT an editor. LOL... what guidelines do ya think I broke? BIG words ya got there little man, lots of talk with no action. Why is it the editors around here have this knack for talking out their backsides? Its clear why all of you keep on about not being spokesmen for the ODP *sigh* seriously though, with each lie, with each personal attack, with each snide comment you are doing nothing but digging DMOZ into a deeper hole. So yes, why on earth would they have kicked me out? Certainly NOT for adding my own site, it was listable. Remember, it was removed and then put back by a different editor. If there was something wrong with that, then I'd assume that editor would have been removed and then my site removed. Now as for the other edits I did, well, they are still there... so again, whats up with the lies? Me leaving was a looooong time ago, and it's only coming out just now? Please, do tell the masses what I did that it took them this loooooooong to figure it out. See if it'll helpo the cause of the ODP or just dig that double standard filled hole of lies a bit deeper.
I love how you twist and turn things In fact it was you that first told me a long time ago, in a thread, that you were an ex-editor. Seeing as you chose to leave and see that you have applied to return, one could safely assume that you will be reinstated. Has that happened?.........You stated that you applied for reinstatement a fair while ago, seeing you believe that you are such a good editor, i would have thought they would have jumped at getting you back by now. Oops....my mistake, your profile still shows you as an Ex-Editor.
I recollect Q's resignation and the events that he claimed at the time triggered it. I don't believe that there was any likelihood that he'd have been fired though. I won't comment on his reinstatement request and, being an ex-meta editor, I wouldn't anyway. I don't know its current status. In general most are readily accepted - though it can take a little time. Some are problematic and need meta discussion about motives, value to the directory, integrity and behaviour. These can take much longer. It takes 5 metas with no objections to decline a reinstatement request.
ROFLAO Strange how one minute you accuse me of being a certain editor and the next of not being an editor at all. Ah what it is to be an editor without portfolio, one can say anything anytime.
@Snooks Whether or not I am reinstated has NOTHING to do with whether or not I left to begin with, so just who is the one twisting things here? You can not be "kicked out" if you are not "in" to begin with, so really, re-read your post and you may just see that once again it's not me doing the twisting. @Jim Thanks again for being level headed. Its really sad you left the ODP, you were one of the few that didn't twist things or throw personal attacks against the poster. You always (or mostly) attacked the post Well, which is it... are you an editor or not? Come on, lets see that profile! Portfolio? Explain further please... though really what's worse, being an editor without a portfolio or being an editor without a profile? Ya see, with my profile you can see where I used to edit, so ya can see I actually used to edit... where is your portfolio (or whatever you are talking about). Come on... you are the one dragging this out. Lets see your proof that you have either of these things!
OMFG ANON... you reply to this bit of the post, but not the rest... ya know, that part about you!?!?!?!?! You are nothing but a no good dirty troll. You never have been, and never will be an editor. How do I know this? Well, in thread after thread I've asked you show proof, and what do I get? Replies about things that have nothing to do with you ~ Which pretty much defines troll. Further proof of your lies is that you've been banned from this site more then once, which shows you have lower morals then what ODP editors should be held up to. So really who should be people believe on matters concerning the ODP... you, a troll that's been banned time & time again from Digital Point, or me, an ex-editor that left in good standing that has never been banned from any forum? My rep is FULL, and has been since I had 1,000 posts, you have what, 200 points? Digital Point should have rules against pretending to be ODP editors, as its misleading....