But imagine how much better off we'd be with an equally inept Kerry running the show !!! we might be talking 9/11_01,03,05 What did Clinton have? like 9 opportunites to take out Osama??
According to the 9/11 Report, I believe there were three separate occasions documented where either Maddam Albright, William Cohen, and Hillary put the stop to it, either by meddling and telling them missiles were coming, or simply worrying about what polls numbers would look like during an election year. Let us also not forget that penis + mouth had a great deal to do with the decision making at the time as well. Looking back, it's pretty clear to me that 8 years of Clinton were probably some of the most devastating the US has ever seen.
With any big event in America, it's easy to blame your government, and assert a truth without much of anything to back it. Even looking at JFK, it's hard not to be suspicious, but looking more into it, you feel a sense that it's just another event that probably did happen as said. Now obviously you'll never get a conclusive answer on some things, but I put this whole 9/11 thing in the back drawer...it's just a loose arguement against the gov, and it would imply far too many complications...well, that and almost everything can be explained. I'm sure there's many questions, and I think it's this nature in man to believe for or against things without really looking into it... which causes him/her a bit of trouble, imo. Here's a descent site that addresses/refutes some of conspiracy surrounding the issue,....some actually new to me. http://www.schnittshow.com/remember.html What I like about this link as well, it that it has a list (and photos) of the victims on 9/11. Some of the families/friends comment on their lost loved ones...it was just nice to browse through there and see the humans behind the number. http://www.september11victims.com/september11victims/victims_list.htm
Schnitt is a radio host here in the Tampa area. I don't like him too much (he also does a morning show on FM that's a lot better, but anyway). He had a friend up in Washington (I think he even had him on air one time) who saw the plane hit the Pentagon - from his office or apartment, I can't remember which.
I can't say I was perfectly believing everything right away...I had a feeling that I needed to know things before I could come to any conclusion (and I had many questions). Right now I feel it's safe to let things go, and no-longer worry about supposed internal workings. It's just not plausible to me,...not incredibly impossible, but very doubtful at this stage.
I'm still amazed that people still think the US Government would not think of harming their people after OPERATION NORTHWOODS. Go look it up, it's now declassified what they planned to do to American citizens back in the 1960s to create a war with Cuba. Some members will say I am talking rubbish but it is there in black and white for all to see. As for Mias comment about Clintons 8 years being "some of the most devastating the US has ever seen" he is not a patch on Bush junior absolutely ruining the world as he is doing a very good job of of at the moment.
And we killed a million people in the phillphines and imprisoned millions of Japanese-american citizens...no ones gullible to think we're perfect or remotely so. Apparently they didn't do the above, so it wouldn't compare with the ones I spoke of. But this isn't convening the proper arguement for this thread, as it's a different coarse in time, and it adds nothing logical to or against such an occurence. Just because Sherman (in the civil war) did attempt to kill as many Indians as possible, doesn't mean our current government is doing so....
But the mere fact that the US Government were planning to SHOOT DOWN AN AMERICAN CIVILLIAN AIRCRAFT AND BLAME IT ON CUBA doesn't resonate with you? Read pages 13 and 14 of the Northwoods document mate, this is a real bonafide document drafted by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Of Staff. It isn't a nursery rhyme. http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/doc1.pdf
Yes, I read about it already...no need for proof. But... It's an illogical arguement to this situation. Associate actions of the far past (which one can say in this situation), amounts to a lapse in general context. People whom were in control die and new leadership arises. As far as your question goes... Sure a lot of things bother me in the past, and now, but I don't assert or grow paraniod based on things so far back that I have to read it in a history book. I try to base it best on the moment, and what I think is plausible or not.
Northwoods: A fake plan where no one dies is DENIED by the US government. If you have any better evidence, then you're welcome to bring it up in the evidence thread.
Oh mate I cannot believe you are trying to say an official government declassified document is fake. I'm amazed how many people cannot see through the BS
We see straight through the BS. I'm amazed people believe in BS. Parents really should spend more time with their kids in their teen years. They are so impressionable. It's sad to see low self-esteem ruin the lives of young angry white males with low IQs.
Well he didn't come back with a constructive answer to what I said about Operation Northwoods. But I didn't expect him to.
Why are constructive replies to plans that were event seriously considered (in fact, unwelcome) in the 60's required?
Some how I doubt he would come back with a constructive answer to the 3rd man on the grassy nole either.
By fake, I meant declassified. But back to the question. What is the connection between a 40 year old declassified document about a falseflag operation where no one dies and 9/11? And why didn't they kept the document from the public if it was so secret? And why are the makers of Loose Change and people like Alex Jones, Steven Jones still alive?