If it's European countries then Football, If it's Asian & Caribbean Countries then Cricket, If It's American Countries then it's Baseball.
Compare to this list, cricket only a joke The 10 clubs who have invested in more players 2009/2010 1. Real Madrid / Spain - € 257,400,000 2. Manchester City / England - € 139,300,000 3. FC Barcelona / Spain - € 113,500,000 4. Internazionale v Italy - € 90,500,000 5. Bayern Munich / Germany - € 74,700,000 6. Olympique Lyon / France - € 72,500,000 7. FC Genoa / Italy - € 69,300,000 8. Juventus / Italy - € 55,300,000 9. Naples / Italy - € 49,700,000 10. Aston Villa / England - € 46,900,000
i think if you are talking worldwide, football is better. But if you are talking in USA, cricket maybe better. It depends on the how many the fans are....
Definitely football it is a global sport. Almost all countries have leagues that athletes play on. Cricket is only less than ten countries are really into it.
according to me Football is more money earner game then cricket. because i the players of football become so popular in very short time because there are so many spectators of football. and after being popular they sign different add contracts and earn so much money.
Well no doubt itz cricket...After the introduction of IPL no game or sport has been earning so much..
ok. football and cricket is diffrent game both are values are diffrent but now days 20-20 cricket has been booming......
This is probably the most accurate way that you can describe it. The two sports are basically worlds apart in the fact that they have completely different fanbases in different sports. Other than that, it is all football if you ask me.