Why US started war against Afghanistan - "Saudi Arabia of lithium" ? New US Discovery

Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by samser_m, Jun 14, 2010.

  1. #1
    The United States has discovered nearly a trillion dollars in untapped mineral deposits in Afghanistan.

    An internal Pentagon memo states that Afghanistan could become the "Saudi Arabia of lithium," a key raw material in the manufacture of batteries for laptops and BlackBerrys.

    http://in.news.yahoo.com/139/20100614/364/twl-us-discovers-one-trillion-dollars-of_1.html

    so, should US grab iron, copper, cobalt, gold and critical industrial metals like lithium from Afghanistan?

    Do you think US was aware of these resources before and started war to dominate without disclosing first so that China can't dominate there?

    I think yes! As US is always resource-hungry and as history show us the same!

    Not OIL, Now iron, copper, cobalt, gold and lithium
     
    samser_m, Jun 14, 2010 IP
  2. Ibn Juferi

    Ibn Juferi Prominent Member

    Messages:
    6,221
    Likes Received:
    365
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #2
    Ibn Juferi, Jun 14, 2010 IP
  3. Vebtools

    Vebtools Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,619
    Likes Received:
    32
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    145
    #3
    they can do anything for oil, for money, even killing of thousands of civilians
     
    Vebtools, Jun 14, 2010 IP
  4. earlpearl

    earlpearl Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,584
    Likes Received:
    150
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    155
    #4
    I suppose the above writers somehow conveniently forgot 9/11 and how Al Queda protected by the Taliban, launched an attack on the US killing about 3,000 people, hijacking 4 jets, destroying the world trade center and the Pentagon.

    Oh, I know, terrorist supporters. Little details like that get lost inside your foggy brains.
     
    earlpearl, Jun 14, 2010 IP
  5. Ibn Juferi

    Ibn Juferi Prominent Member

    Messages:
    6,221
    Likes Received:
    365
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #5
    Only idiots will buy that fabricated story sold by the United States of Israel.

    Argumentum ad hominem. Try again.
     
    Ibn Juferi, Jun 14, 2010 IP
  6. Obamanation

    Obamanation Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    8,016
    Likes Received:
    237
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #6
    Only idiots indeed. Nice Ad Hom. Keep the hypocrisy coming.
     
    Obamanation, Jun 14, 2010 IP
  7. Ibn Juferi

    Ibn Juferi Prominent Member

    Messages:
    6,221
    Likes Received:
    365
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #7
    I wonder whether you actually understand what "argumentum ad hominem" (argument against the man) means?
     
    Ibn Juferi, Jun 14, 2010 IP
  8. Obamanation

    Obamanation Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    8,016
    Likes Received:
    237
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #8
    Or if you understand the meaning of the word idiot when generalized in application to those carrying a particular belief.
     
    Obamanation, Jun 14, 2010 IP
  9. Ibn Juferi

    Ibn Juferi Prominent Member

    Messages:
    6,221
    Likes Received:
    365
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #9
    Calling me an "idiot" is ad hominem because being an "idiot" does not factor into the argument. Making a case for a "United States of Israel", based on their foreign policy favouring Israel is not. Learn the difference!
     
    Ibn Juferi, Jun 14, 2010 IP
  10. Obamanation

    Obamanation Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    8,016
    Likes Received:
    237
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #10
    You mean like the difference between calling someone an idiot, and saying "only idiots believe ..."? With argumentation like that, had I not seen your picture (assuming that is you), I would say you are nine.
     
    Obamanation, Jun 14, 2010 IP
  11. looking4vps

    looking4vps Peon

    Messages:
    1,495
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11
    i don't think the should have stayed there as long as they have
     
    looking4vps, Jun 14, 2010 IP
  12. samser_m

    samser_m Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    990
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    110
    #12
    So US killed more than 3000 thousands. Who is the more terrorists? Dont you think only war was only solution? Have the stopped terrorism worldwide, no!

    Reason behind the wars are clear - IRAQ - OIL, Afghanistan - Now Iron, Gold, Lithium + pipeline

    We know its hard to sallow the truth and that's why its easy for you to call someone terrorists. But you seems another terrorist behind mask.
     
    samser_m, Jun 15, 2010 IP
  13. Ibn Juferi

    Ibn Juferi Prominent Member

    Messages:
    6,221
    Likes Received:
    365
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    310
    #13
    Waging war and imperialism is all about gathering resources. United States of Israel is no exception to the rule.
     
    Ibn Juferi, Jun 15, 2010 IP
  14. Obamanation

    Obamanation Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    8,016
    Likes Received:
    237
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #14
    Gee Samser, you are pretty clever. You've put together all that from little pieces of unrelated evidence without corroboration by facts and it is "clear" to you, and yet when Hamas openly states and refuses to recant their desire to wipe Israel from the map you cant see them as anything but victims. I guess such clarity is reserved for the starry eyed faithful and their magic book written by a pedophile.
     
    Obamanation, Jun 15, 2010 IP
  15. earlpearl

    earlpearl Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,584
    Likes Received:
    150
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    155
    #15
    Contrary to the accusations of the wild eyed supporters of Islamic terrorism this recent thread from DP, referencing an article, that describes how the US is NOT gaining control of national resources in Iraq, runs completely contrary to the accusations that the US is in there to control the national output: http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=1574867&pagenumber=

    The difference between the facts from this article and the crazy accusations is the difference between reality and fundamentalist terror inspired hatred. It simply distorts facts.

    Frankly, if I was a wild Islamic fundamentalist, this is what I'd be nevous about with regard to significant mineral deposits in Afghanistan:

    China sits next door to Afghanistan. China is aggressively making an effort to swallow up natural resources around the globe; in Africa, Australia, South America, and of course in Asia. China takes no prisoners. It attacks, emprisons, and kills the small minority of Islamics in Western China. It doesn't put up with any cr@p.

    China is next door to Afghanistan. If China steps up into the breach to try and take advantage of the enormous mineral deposits in Afghanistan, it will simply slaughter any fundamentalist Islamics that gets into its way, no questions asked. Any issues, it would be easy for China to send in 1 million Chinese troops next door, and wipe out any fundamentalist Islamic who dares to get in the way.
     
    earlpearl, Jun 15, 2010 IP
  16. nightcrawlers

    nightcrawlers Active Member

    Messages:
    453
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #16
    Another reason to stay in Afghanistan, but they need to educate people first otherwise it would be the same condition... Big companies going to extract the reserves and greedy leaders eat the commission and people will get fucked by USA and Afghanistani Leaders!
     
    nightcrawlers, Jun 15, 2010 IP
  17. masterrio

    masterrio Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    938
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    145
    #17
    US has been always greedy when it came to occupying natural resources, it used 9/11 for its convenience, I seriously doubt if US was really unable to find Laden or is he just made a scapegoat to get their resources

    I am not saying or supporting Laden (actually I would like to kill him and his followers, if I get a chance :p), but for some forces to be helpless to find a single person after rooting in the nation for over 7years is quite dubious

    if US is really loyal to the commitments, they must never ever use other nation's resources for self necessities, unless they pay for the products
     
    masterrio, Jun 15, 2010 IP
  18. nightcrawlers

    nightcrawlers Active Member

    Messages:
    453
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #18
    He is already dead! How come the person can live who cannot live without Dialysis. I wonder if he is running on mountains with a Dialysis machine... Technology is so advanced these days if Americans want to track someone, they can do it easily.
     
    nightcrawlers, Jun 15, 2010 IP
  19. samser_m

    samser_m Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    990
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    110
    #19
    If Hamas desire to wipe Israel then Israel funded by US have the same mind to wipe Palestine. Another form of terrorism!
     
    samser_m, Jun 15, 2010 IP
  20. Obamanation

    Obamanation Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    8,016
    Likes Received:
    237
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    180
    #20
    No no no! Polite teen explained it all to me. It is actually Israel who are the terrorists, not Hamas even though Hamas has stated they desire to wipe Israel from the map while Israel has made no such reciprocal statement. Let me clarify it for you:

    Polite Teen's explanation is far more honest than you claiming Israel's efforts to defend themselves are terrorism. You need to revisit your Qur'an and study so your posts can be more clear and concise, and less idiotic.
     
    Obamanation, Jun 15, 2010 IP