The issue of Taliban's and Naxal's are not almost same the Naxals are those who have been suffered from Govt. and there are many people who have been suffered as their land or some other things have been snatched by Govt or the countries neighbor country. But Talibans main intention is to hurt people why they are also not demanding their rights like Naxals. Taliban want to convert All south Asian countries into Muslim nation and this is fact. So they are killing people those who dont follow Talibans evil law.
There's no difference between terrorists and naxals because the intention of both is to terrorize people. Naxals think that they will get their rights by killing people which is absolutely stupid. I think govt should go on an all out war with these guys like Sri Lanka did against the LTTE.
The Taliban are just demanding their right (defined in Sura 9:29) to rule the world. They see it as not fundamentally different. The Maoists are mad and are therefore murdering people. The people they murder may have nothing to do with whatever wrongs the Maoists believe have been done to them. I don't see how this is an improvement over the Taliban.
If taliban is allowed to rule on world than do you think every "lady" is safe or Non Muslims are safe. They will force other people to accept Islam and those who will not accept it they will do same what they are doing right now. I think this idea to is not worthful. The Maoist are killing people not because they are their enemy because they want to affect Govt. infact they should kill those minister who are corrupted like Rang De Basanti(RDB). Yes than and than only those ministers will come to know.
The Maoist are forcing many villagers to support them.. they even attack civilains or cops which is pretty much bad.. and mainly the naxals claim by 2050-60 they will take over full india..
How do you justify that morally? "I'm mad at this guy over there, so I think I'll kill these random people over here." Nice. This kind of thinking only goes to prove that Communism is a religion unto itself. Not if they are dead, which is what the proper response from the Indian government should ensure.
the taliban, which may be primitive and backward but then they too have a justice system. in the mid-nineties, a couple of girls were picked up by a local warlord and was gangraped. the father of the girls went to mulla omar and pleded with him. the next day the head of the warlord was found hanging on the barrel of a trunk. the news spread like wildfire and thousands volunteered to support mulla omar. and a movement called taliban was borned. in our proud democratic country when some innocent girl gets raped/molested sadly her father has no where to go to seek justice. i sincerely wished we had someone like mulla omar. the world denouced the maoist in Nepal. and guess what happed. yes the maoists are mad and we need more of such madmen. they are killing rapists thugs politians, rouge cops. whats wrong in that. why you are so blind to see the evils of rapists thugs and what not. wrong. no movement like the naxals can succeed without the mass public support. which cop you are trying to defend the one like rathod indian govt is busy shielding mass muderers and rapist. have you ever think of that.
The Muslims don't think it but it IS an evil action. Both groups are "fighting" for something they want, with absolutely no concern for the people they hurt in the process. Its good to fight for their right but without harming other people. The general public should protest against this kind of activities. Except protesting there is not other thing which should be done. That what all are wondering why they are targeting innocent people. They are proving that they can do anything to fulfill their demands. In this kind of thing Govt. has to take strict actions. Their should be no more talk like Kashmir issue other wise Maoist will taken a way whole India
I'm not the sort to begrudge you a political assassination or two, but that's not what's happening. The Maoists are terrorizing and murdering innocent people and for that they need to be stopped in the most permanent manner possible. The Indian government is performing so terribly against these Maoist asshats that it terrifies me to think of what would happen if Pakistan was to initiate a major military offensive.
it is a misconception in your mind that the maoists are terrorizing and murdering the common folks. the maoist have build an army, of tens and thousands. do you really think one can mobilize such support out of thin air or oppression. i am not a communist, far from it. i tend to follow mother nature. and mother nature is a hard core capitalist (survival of the fittest). so am i. but then when it comes to choose who the ruler of my country will be, some bunch of rapist and muderers or the maoist, i choose the later. any sane man will do so. the indian govt is one of the most corrupted in the world. what can you expect from them. lucky for us the Pakistani govt is even a step ahead. President zardari is known as Mr. 10%. ask any Pakistani boarder here, his will echo my words. Both India and Pakistan can and will do good without our respective govts.
April 22, 2009: Maoists hijack a train with at least 300 people on board in Jharkhand and force it to Latehar district before fleeing. July 18, 2009: Maoists kill a villager in Bastar and in a separate incident torch a vehicle engaged in road construction work in Bijapur district of Chhattisgarh. July 23, 2009: A 40-year-old tribal killed by Maoists at Ettapalli taluka in Gadchiroli district. July 27, 2009: Six persons killed when Maoists trigger a landmine blast at Dantewada district in Chhattisgarh. Sep 4, 2009: Maoists kill four villagers in a forest in Aaded village in Chhattisgarh's Bijapur district.
i think its better to refer to the link as provided by the thread starter. most of these "innocent ppl" are either police informer or agent of the ruling party, or the infamous upper class of the society, sucking blood of the common ppl. hhmmm these "innocent ppl" are very much similar to the "peace activists" currently in news. you know na, the pic you post often. but you left the most recent one. http://www.ptinews.com/news/678540_Jnaneswari-Express-tragedy--148-dead-so-far it is blamed on the maoist, which they deny. one story going it is the acts of the ruling communists of west benagal (CPI(M), not the naxals/maoist) just before the municipal polls to put the railway minister (Ms Mamta Banerjee, their opponet) in fauxpas. but if you ask me it is a simple case of negligence (no maintenance of railway track). the maoist are always there as a scaegoat.
Not much discussion can be had if you are simply going to deny all evidence which does not support your prejudices. Let's try another tack. These boys hold to the principles of Mao Zedong, a ruthless cold-blooded mass murderer. They seem to be living by his words, "Revolution is not a dinner party, nor an essay, nor a painting, nor a piece of embroidery; it cannot be advanced softly, gradually, carefully, considerately, respectfully, politely, plainly, and modestly. A revolution is an insurrection, an act of violence by which one class overthrows another." Mao murdered millions of Chinese, but let's look at how he treated his own people, the Red Chinese: Under the direction of Mao, it is reported that horrible methods of torture took place and given names such as 'sitting in a sedan chair', 'airplane ride', 'toad-drinking water', and 'monkey pulling reins.' The wives of several suspects had their breasts cut open and their genitals burned. Short (2001) estimates that tens of thousands of suspected enemies, perhaps as many as 186,000, were killed during this purge. Or we can look at how he treated the people of China once he conquered them: Mao himself claimed that a total of 700,000 people were executed during the years 1949–53. However, because there was a policy to select "at least one landlord, and usually several, in virtually every village for public execution", the number of deaths range between 2 million and 5 million. In addition, at least 1.5 million people, perhaps as many as 4 to 6 million, were sent to "reform through labour" camps where many perished. Mao played a personal role in organizing the mass repressions and established a system of execution quotas, which were often exceeded. Nevertheless he defended these killings as necessary for the securing of power. This is the guy you and your friends want to emulate? This is the future you want for India?
i am denying nothing. i am just presenting the reasons for the actions of masses (maoists). ppl will rise against the system whenever when there is oppression/misrule etc. it is futile to discuss under which banner they are in. there will always be a banner. it was the masses which supported the Bolsheviks in the 1917's. and it was masses which removed them in the '90s. same goes with any system. be it maoism, monarchy, religious bigots or democracy as a matter of fact. just read the horrors of a 14 year old girl (and his family). 15000+ ppl gets killed and guess what happened. and it is not even the tip of the iceberg. we need to pay bribe to get the birth certificate when a child is born. we need to pay bribe to get the mortal remains of our loved ones when he/she passes away. and our journey from life to death is not really a rosy one under this democracy. no sane person would choose maoism (or communism or whatever) over democracy. but then times are such and as i already said dont even mind the taliban. cheers
i am not trying to defend any cop i am sure there are bad cops everywhere be it in Kashmir be it in Naxal areas these people are the people who spoil all the good things done by the govt to fix issues aswell as they spoil the names of cops even our indian army is filled with such bad people... 4get indian even american forces have such people in.... so not much u can do abt that
injustice can be found in every society. but then there are some sort of justice mechanism too. in india there no justice atall. and thats concerns me. in india one can do heinous crimes and still walk away freely with head held high. that concerns me. the world will not be destroyed by the action of the bad ppl, but will be destroyed due to the inaction of the good ppl.
I'm sure that Joe Stalin, Adolph Hitler, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot, and Osama bin Laden had their reasons too, but reasons cannot be equated with moral justification. "I murdered my neighbor because he had his stereo up too loud" is a reason, but not a justification. Choosing to support the creation of a worse system just because the current one is bad seems... not very rational. Yes, the current system is bad. The Indian people have too few rights; the Indian government has too many. This power, as it always does, has corrupted the government and made it inefficient and unresponsive. But replacing it with a group that would likely murder tens or hundreds of millions of Indians... that doesn't sound like such a great idea. It is very important to discuss under which banner you attempt to replace the current regime. You could easily find yourself jumping from the frying pan into the fire.
boy o boy, when gassing of masses and raping of innocent girls got into the good side of morality. you rightly said, power corrupts. and when it does it should be dealt with.the anlogy holds for everybody/every-system. including democracy. every system has its pros and cons. when the cons overrides it only natural another system over-succeeds it. Hitler was instrumental in getting Germany out of the horrors of WW-I and was elected with an mandate of 84%. had there been no purge there would had been no great soviet union. and tell our muslim brother osama is evil. na you know better. had there been no Mao the Chinese would still be smoking marijuana. and ya Mao still sell hot in China. dont get me wrong, i am not defending them or their actions but its very easy to condemn the fallen.
If The Government of India have to be so strong in this matter because Maoists are established himself very strongly.