If you take a look at pictures took on boat they hade every oportunity to kill soldier so if they were terorrists why they didn't kill any of them? YOu can try to be funny all day long but that isn't answer on my question. Are you say that you need to be highly trained to kill a man who are down on the ground? Yes, it does matter. If they are terrorists as you guys claim why they didn't kill anyone? Terrorists gladly kill innocent people, including woman and children, but here they had a chance to kill enemy soldeirs and didn't! Why? lol did you look at the pictures? A soldeir is on the ground unable to defend himself yet they didn't kill him. Because he was trained pro?!? Are you kidding me?!? Take a look at pictures again and tell me: if they were terrorists wanting to kill israeli soldeirs why they didn't kill anyone?
As soon as they struck the first blow, they were terrorists. End of story. I'm not claiming they were competent. But, in their defense, there was quite a battle going on around them. It's hard to make sure a person is down permanently when his buddies are shooting at you. You are saying that maybe they were clubbing, stabbing, and shooting the Jews for peaceful purposes? Anyone who thinks those activities are peaceful, let me try them on you for just a few minutes.
If they didnt attack the soldiers... how do you explain the soldiers being " on the ground unable to defend himself"? Poor balance? Sorry you identify with bozos who lost. They probably shouldnt have attacked. They got their butts kicked. Better luck next time.
lol so when you attack lets say police with a stick you are terrorist? Seriously! Anyway take a look at pictures one more time and keep telling your fairtale why noone get killed. A little kid,if they wanted, could kill those soldiers. I don't see anyone shooting at anyone on those pics. It must be in your head. Did you see pictures btw? It seems to me that you missed those. That's why you have hard time to explain how none of israeli soldeirs got killed. Yes, sodleirs got attacked but none of them got killed. And you guys claim that they were attacked by terrorists.! A terrorists who kills woman and childeren but they missed oportunity to kill isreali soldeirs! Wow! Imagine that! You guys have hard time to explain it as I can see.
We can lead an ass to water, but we can't make him drink. Go ahead and believe that those boys were beating people with clubs, stabbing them with knives, and shooting them for peaceful purposes. You're obviously truth resistant.
Yes, they wanted to hurt them but if they were terrorist,as you claim, they would be dead. At least those on pictures. In violent protests you want to harm police. Not to kill them. Actually you are obviously truth resistant. I'll repeat my question one more tim: if they are terrorists why the hell they didn't kill any of israeli soldeirs? I know you will not answer. Again. And again.
Wow, are you really that bitter that your little heroes got their butts kicked? Get a grip. You've been answered, sorry you dont like the answer.
Once again, who cares. I don't care if the Pope, The Mother Theresa, Ghandi, Dr. King, and Nelson Mendela were on the boat. You try and pass a naval blockade, you get sunk. End of story. You attack soldiers boarding your boat in service to a blockade and you get two between the eyes. End of story. Seriously, why do you keep bringing up the issue of whether or not they were terrorists? I personally suspect they were terrorist, or terrorist supporters, but what does it matter? They are dead. The rest who aren't should count their blessings and wise up.
You haven't answered anything because you can't accept facts. Period. Someone was shooting someone so that's why they didn't kill anyone?!? LMAO! That's at least hilarious Seriously guys, you fail miserably sticking to your fairtales.
If noone cares they wouldn't be proclaimed terrorists and someone wouldn't reapt that like 100s times even here on DP. Cut the crap. Everyone cares. Terorrists are easy to kill and everyone chears about it.
You dont find it funny that someone trying to run a military blockade and attacking soldiers is being called a "peace activist"? LOL. Buy a dictionary kid.
I find it funny that you guys try to convice us that they were blood thirsty terrorists who wanted to kill israeli soldiers. It's just that you have hard time to do so.
This is still my favorite picture of one of the peace activists: This whole NewSpeak thing where "murder" becomes "protest" and "murderer" becomes "peace activist" if the intended victim is a Jew is really hard on my old brain to update to. How many do 2 and 2 equal today?
Ok, who was shooting on who so they didn't have time to kill any of soldeirs? I must missed that. Can you show us those pictures? Or vids?
The videos showing their attack have already been posted. The fact that they got thier butt kicked isnt our fault, talk to them.
Seriously kid, several of us have answered your questions several times. It's not our fault that you're thick headed. Blame your sperm and egg donors.
Your questions were answered, you just dont like the answer and arent quite smart enough to figure out that's already evident.
Oh sure, from a "They are gone, we'll miss them" stand point, we are interested in knowing who they were. Given their ties to Hamas, a terrorist organization, everyone cheers when they are killed. If it had been someone well liked with ties to real humanitarian causes, like Ariel Sharon, everyone would mourn. Regardless, as I said before, whether it was a group of Islamic terrorists or Ariel Sharon is beside the point. They ran a naval blockade, and attacked the armed soldiers who were enforcing the blockade. They suffered the consequences. End of story.
Yes, you were saying about someone shooting at someone but I you didn't managed to provide any evidence for that so I guess you were there. Right? End of disscusion. Go insult someone else. Reported. It's only begining of story. And you know it.