5 Years Later -- Are we any safer (A soldiers thoughts)

Will do!

- Increased airport security
- Monitoring bank transactions
- USED TO BE monitoring some phone calls of suspected terrorists
- More intelligence investigations
- Removed a terrorist dictator from power

And the list goes on...

 

I was asking Gtech to explain why he thinks the UK 'has so many problems today'.

What are the differences in policies?

 

Given that I've already pointed that out, it's quite apparent that you have and continue to plan to overlook it.

If you would read, instead of asking stupid questions all the time, you might learn something. You could also choose to debate, instead of pretending to ask questions to cover up the fact you really don't have a clue.

 

You also asked what the US has done to stop terrorism in the US.

And I'm sorry that I didn't read your mind to know you were referring to Gtech

 

You didn't point out anything, you posted links to a few news stories in the UK related to terror. You suggested the UK has more terror problems than the US because of some differences in policies.

The UK invaded Iraq too.

You are unable to back up your statements, hence no direct answer.

Plase explain what the UK is doing wrong regarding terrorism? Which policies are you referring to?

 

I pointed it out and as usual, you ignored it.

You'll need to read up on my sources for that. In fact, you could comment on them, but that would require effort which isn't your style, and it's much easier to ask more questions. Lazy debate

Are you ashamed that people like you are the reason the UK has so many problems with terrorism?

 

Again, you don't know how to answer the question.

Bush is doing a great job , actually all of his policies are perfect!!

The UK got some problesm but I dont know why!!!!

 

It wouldn't matter. mistermixedup's strategy is an obvious one. He won't debate issues. Instead of commenting and debating, he wants to *try* to remain in control by only asking questions. Often times questions that have no basis in the first place.

If you watch and notice his posts, it's the same strategy over and over. Ask a question, get an answer, move on to ask another question, get an answer. It's just laziness, and a weak attempt to try and remain in control.

If he really wanted to impress someone, he'd tackle issues and actually debate them, but he doesn't have the skills to do that

 

No, you don't know how to comment on my lengthy post, so you pretend to do so with lame questions.

Admit it, you don't have a clue and you can't debate issues. It's obvious to everyone

 

Keep making statements with no foundations and I will continue to ask you to explain what you mean.

Still not have no idea what the UK Gov. is doing wrong regarding terrorism?

People like me are the problem? What do you mean Gtech?

 

Here we go! This is just in the last three pages:

No debate, ignore the issues, answer everything with questions. You are as lazy as they come and you have no clue!

 

Still waiting for your comments, mixedup!

http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=1426336&postcount=178

 

The questions you ask have insinuations about me as a person, and deflect from the issues.

You attempt to label people as being either patriotic or non patriotic (according to your personal definition) so you can try to justify deriding the non patriotic (according to you) posters.

But while you are doing that, you aren't discussing the issues.

If you want praise for the USA, start a thread about it, don't expect to see it in every thread, from every poster, no matter what the topic is.

I have lots of good things to say about our country. But they do not include the current administrations policies.

 

Kaethy, I think you defined yourself perfectly here:

http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showpost.php?p=1316354&postcount=132

 

No, it was a simple question based upon numerous observations where I gave you the benefit of the doubt. It did not require rewriting an episode of "Days of our Lives" nor were tissues required. But you are playing the victim role admirably

 

I dont answer everything with question - I just ask questions. Theres a difference.

You are more concerned with haveing a tit-for-tat SQUABBLE than actually talking about the issue you think you know so much about.


You can't answer questions about your views because you dont have a clue!

yeeeeeeeeee haaaa!! IRAN 2009

 

LMAO! Nothing but questions! You can't debate because you don't know the issues. One question, after another, after another. I think I more than made my point

BTW, here's about 400 more.

 

I ask questions so I must not know anything.

OR

You don't answer questions because you don't know how to expand on your claims with some logic.

The UK's got so many problems!! They doing it all wrong!!! I dont know why!!!


Yeeeeeeee Haaaa!!

 

Actually what you do is attempt to bait people. You ask questions you already have an answer to, but for some reason have chosen not to accept the facts as the answer. As a result you choose to argue your altered view of reality by asking people to answer the obvious.

Now "There's a difference!"

 

Kind of sucks when you get busted, eh? No commentary, no debate, just questions to cover up the fact you don't know anything