Google and duplicate content

Discussion in 'Google' started by China_girl, Apr 5, 2010.

  1. #1
    It has just occurred to me that all my lengthy privacy policy page share about 99% content with my other websites and include about 1200 words. Given that I have a number of website plus my mentor provided me with his privacy policy so there probably hundreds of pages like this on internet.

    Do you have any views on how google will treat this in relation to duplicate content?
     
    China_girl, Apr 5, 2010 IP
  2. bluesinjid

    bluesinjid Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    430
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    130
    #2
    Doesn't really matter if you privacy pollicy is copied, as that is not your main content. If you have interesting unique articles, then you are fine.
     
    bluesinjid, Apr 5, 2010 IP
  3. larysmith711

    larysmith711 Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,374
    Likes Received:
    341
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    215
    #3
    If your worried add this to that page:

    <meta name="robots" content="noindex,nofollow">
     
    larysmith711, Apr 5, 2010 IP
  4. dcristo

    dcristo Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    19,776
    Likes Received:
    1,200
    Best Answers:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    470
    Articles:
    7
    #4
    There is a lot of misinformation on how google deals with duplicate content. It deals with it using filters, you don't need to be concerned with your site being penalized.
     
    dcristo, Apr 5, 2010 IP
  5. reapr

    reapr Peon

    Messages:
    1,711
    Likes Received:
    18
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    noindex, nofollow ... my 20 plus regular sites share the exact same policy and are not penalized!
     
    reapr, Apr 5, 2010 IP
  6. dcristo

    dcristo Illustrious Member

    Messages:
    19,776
    Likes Received:
    1,200
    Best Answers:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    470
    Articles:
    7
    #6
    You wouldn't be penalized even if you didn't use that tag.
     
    dcristo, Apr 5, 2010 IP
  7. Flow Motion

    Flow Motion Active Member

    Messages:
    83
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Digital Goods:
    1
    #7
    Ya you wouldnt be penalized
     
    Flow Motion, Apr 5, 2010 IP
  8. China_girl

    China_girl Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,095
    Likes Received:
    72
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    195
    #8
    Thanks for the comment, appreciated :)
     
    China_girl, Apr 5, 2010 IP
  9. smsinhindi

    smsinhindi Peon

    Messages:
    561
    Likes Received:
    5
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    I agree.. Privacy policy is not the main content of your site, so google won't consider it as duplicate content.
     
    smsinhindi, Apr 6, 2010 IP
  10. WunschShrek

    WunschShrek Peon

    Messages:
    629
    Likes Received:
    15
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    This person is spot on. You do not have to be concerned.
     
    WunschShrek, Apr 6, 2010 IP
  11. zesmedia

    zesmedia Peon

    Messages:
    134
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11
    Google won't consider about duplicate content. They are very inteligent to discover it.
     
    zesmedia, May 7, 2010 IP
  12. clbyodo

    clbyodo Peon

    Messages:
    3,457
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #12
    Dont worry google will do not know about duplicate account.
     
    clbyodo, May 7, 2010 IP
  13. mrpaisa

    mrpaisa Guest

    Messages:
    741
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #13
    Duplicate content is one of the reason for falling PR in Google.
     
    mrpaisa, May 9, 2010 IP
  14. larysmith711

    larysmith711 Notable Member

    Messages:
    3,374
    Likes Received:
    341
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    215
    #14
    What... really? I doubt duplicate content has any impact on PR.
     
    larysmith711, Jun 9, 2010 IP
  15. tonsblogger

    tonsblogger Active Member

    Messages:
    330
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    53
    #15
    <meta name="robots" content="noindex,nofollow"> this was a great idea to kill your worries.
     
    tonsblogger, Jun 9, 2010 IP
  16. Sxperm

    Sxperm Notable Member

    Messages:
    4,386
    Likes Received:
    142
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    225
    #16
    It may be the duplicated but not a big deal from Google perspective. This kind of page has been discussed about duplication before but the conclusion was a no negative impact on your website if overall contents are unique and not 100% exact in each and every content pages under your website compare to other ones.
     
    Sxperm, Jun 10, 2010 IP
    beckywildkid likes this.
  17. sussanesylvia

    sussanesylvia Peon

    Messages:
    107
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #17
    Dont worry about that single page. Your site won't be harmed because of that one duplicate page. Just ensure other pages have unique content.
     
    sussanesylvia, Jun 10, 2010 IP
  18. Tech Zone

    Tech Zone Peon

    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #18
    Almost every site on the web has a similar privacy policy. I wouldn't worry about it being treated as duplicate content. I think Google is intelligent enough to figure that out.
     
    Tech Zone, Jun 11, 2010 IP
  19. robster vaughn

    robster vaughn Peon

    Messages:
    72
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #19
    There is no penalty 'Duplicate Content Penalty' so you can continue to submit your articles to any article submission sites and the other 500 to which I submit mine by means of syndication and direct submissions or you can use 301 redirects in your .htaccess file to redirect users, googlebot and also other spiders.
     
    robster vaughn, Jun 11, 2010 IP