If one has issue with his or her partners income than they are not his partner, I think they are partner of money.
Haha..you got it all wrong, its the women who won't live with a man they would need to support.....and you thought men have a problem living off their partners money!
Maybe in India Helvetti - where I come from women are happy to pull their weight financially most of the time - I know I am. I make more than my partner and largely support him too I think you're the one is mistaken in this case, or thinking only of India.
I'm not sure - this one wasn't clear to me; "Haha..you got it all wrong, its the women who won't live with a man they would need to support.....and you thought men have a problem living off their partners money!"
You said: Indian Males should be supportive (i.e. not have a issue with their wives/gf's earning more than them) I said: You misunderstood, its the females who have the issue with their Husb./bf's earning less than them. Clear now?
I actually said; But I get it now, yeah; I wasn't sure how much of the prior page meant just Indians or males/females in general.
Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will Free Will
Personally, and this is just me, but I don't let a bunch of pedophiles set moral standards in my life. 'Does your religion allow...'? Seriously? Don't be enslaved by this organized crime, brain washing bunch of hypocrites...
Your philosophy does not explain where man comes from and why we are here. But I agree. If you listen to religious leaders, then IMO you're missing the train.
What philosophy are you referring to? I actually believe in evolution, which explains where man comes from quite nicely.
Sure, but there will always be that one missing link you'll never be able to explain. Where did the first atom originate?
Matter has always been around. Nothing gets wasted in this universe, it just changes state of existence. Carbon for example exists in three states, as we know it: graphite, diamond, and fullerines. It also exists in endless combinations with other elements, such as oxygen, hydrogen, etc.
That is the eternal question. I can't say that I can provide any insight on that. Our best scientific minds have been working on decoding the origin of the universe for as long as there has been science. There are a number of different theories that offer different explanations, but no one can say with certainty. Its all based on a lot of other theories, assumptions, and variables. I'm not claiming to have some kind of inside information on any of this. All I'm saying is that the scientific explanation of the origin of the universe makes a lot more sense to people who think rationally.
True. I do believe in rational thinking. But thinking rationally, I have to accept everything as relative. So for example, the tiniest of molecules structurally speaking is not different than an architectural masterpiece in itself. I don't see the bridge ever being gapped between the first particle and the "nothing" whatever that was.