Oh, I understand Arnie. I was just surprised that Edz was being suckered in. I thought he was above all that. I was wrong.
You quoted Latehorn yet you refer your reply to Latehorn. Now i understand your latest reply. Reading disorder obviously. The ball is still in your court GTech.
I'm not lost, that's for sure. Latehorn do you perhaps want to contribute to the WTC 7 issue? since apparently GTech is not able to respond.
I think this is a good documentary on the 911 event. I bought a VCD from them last year. http://www.loosechange911.info
Well it might be tilting a little bit in controlled demolition, but you can clearly see that the destruction of WTC7 starts from the top. Compare it with an actuall controlled demolishon like this. You also don't hear any significant explotions going of before the tower starts to fall. I doubt that no one would the demolishon group, concerning the equipment they need to take with them but mostly because you need them to shut up.
To prep for a controlled demolition of a building it takes a long time to carefully cut support beems before placing explosives. I can't imagine how many explosives it wold take to bring down WTC7 without cutting any support and how it would not have been caught or why any of the demolition experts would not have questioned what they are doing. Now on the flip side, I imagine that 2 huge towers falling have quite a bit of energy and the debris could easily cause damage to surrounding buildings. IMHO the latter seems a lot more plausable.
This is an evidence thread, not a posting a link to a conspiracy site. Beyond that, Loose Change includes so much factual errors that you might wonder if the producer can sleep well at nights. All of you that actually believes in this crap should check out the errors.
Here is a debate between the loose change creators and popular mechanics: http://hotair.com/archives/2006/09/...ics-editors-debate-loose-change-morons-on-911 (its like 4 parts) If you dont want to watch... I'll sum it up. Loose change: (video clip) Popular mechanics: *rattles off a bunch of facts debunking what you just saw* loose change: nuh uh! that's all lies! you're a liar! popular mechanics: *rattles off a bunch more facts* (next topic of "conspiracy")
BTW, 9/11 moonbats defiled the WTC site today: http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=22522_9-11_Conspiracists_Defile_WTC_Site Notice the young angry white males with low IQs. This is what happens when parents ignore their kids when they are in their teens.
I can't believe it's still a question. Fortunatly all the stupid is on the liberal side so idiotic conspiracies like this only hurt democratic candidates. When it was Gore v Bush I was hoping for a good fight. I wanted to see two good candidates fighting to earn the presidency rather than a battle between villiage idiots. Same with Bush v Kerry. I've stopped caring. It's been almost 6 years and liberals are still acting like little children. I'll be voting Republican across the board unless something dramatic happens. Bush may not be the smartest man in the world but at least he knows who the enemy is.
what you have to say about this documentary: http:// video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5946593973848835726
jeez, the most popular but also one of the most false 9/11 videos out on the net. If you had read the thread, you might have noticed that I allready have responded to this video. I have also complained on people that post a video and don't argue for anything. It's a sick laziness from your side, if you think you have any point that supports a conspiracy, make it clear in text. But fortunally I have allready watched it so I know what crap it is. 1. Read this guide 2. Ask yourself the question, why is this guy still alive?
I think he realizes that. It makes the point in cartoons (to help the low IQ types out) Here is the complete rebuttal, which sums it all up with language that they can understand too: http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons (even though the whole "glenn beck" section is weird; he didn't get that glenn was being sarcastic..so its kinda funny).