http://www.twitterglitter.com/ the website above is using autoblog / autogenerated content, yet.. traffic is good. Anybody know what kind of autoblog plugin is he using?
Yeah, I say the "about" page didn`t change yet. Somebody know what the site use for their content creation?
What makes you think it's an autoblog plug in. You know, most people actually still put the work in and write real content. Auotblog rarely has the entire article since most webmasters deny scrapping the entire article and only allow excerpts ( because of autoblogging). These are full articles, so I highly doubt it's an auto blog.
If you dont know, please dont answer. Believe me, its an autoblog with full RSS feed. And this kind of tool does EXIST. I've been spying that site for the longest time. In fact, this site took my content too, just 5 minutes after I update my site. Check this proof= http://www.twitterglitter.com/celebrity-news/jimmy-kimmels-day-with-richard-simmons-10/ This autoblog software can resize the picture too, everything is done automatic. Anybody know how to find out what kind of plugin he use? So far my guess is either Caffeinated Content, Autoblogged, Yet Another Auto Blogger, Wprobot, and Wpomatic. There still manymore out there.
Its not BlogSense, I checked for an admin panel. I could also be wptweetbomb. And also he could be using other methods for turning partial to full rss. Not many autoblogging platforms can do this yet besides my BlogSense and I believe The Most Powerful Autoblogging Software is claiming the capability too.
Hmmn. O.K., sir , then figure it our for yourself. what I'm telling you is, there is no autoblog software that can override RSS settings. If I set my feed to only display excerpts, or just headline,or turn it off... no software can override that. There is nothing for them to scrape. He is either copying and pasting content, or taking it form a designated source.That is not an autoblog, that is just stealing, even if he is using software to do it. But I'll shut up and let someone tell you what you want to hear, instead of the truth so you can get the same system and become another content stealer instead of doing your own work.
BlogSense can turn a partial rss into a full rss feed. How? It uses html parameters to extract the content from the original site. It can even do this on pages that have no rss feed at all. When addressing thievery, there is no site that is safe from content theft anymore. What does that mean for the internet... I do not know. But I am certain everyone will all adapt and the total of pains and aggravations will be very small. There are and will be misuses, and propper uses, and benefits from misuses and harms from minuses. But lets talk about an honest blogger who is a good content writer, who is involved in his niche, and has and continues to develop a strong reader base. He is akin to the lion. Content thieves and sploggers, are like flys. They are the newbies thinking they can make quick cash with little effort. The lion stands in pride and is a king, and he doesn't mind himself with the flys because they are pests beneath him with short lifespans. He has more noble things to mind. Now then, there are Hyenas and they are admirable or despicable adversary that mock the lions roar. These are those who are successful in BlackHat tactics and through their actions and self serving justifications they mock the indignation of the honest and offended developer. They steal and profit from the lions kill... But at the end of it all the Lion is still the Lion, the Hyena still the Hyena, the flys the fly, and the Lion is king. That was fun.... wish I had more ideas for metaphors : D
Don;t wanna argue with you, but thats what RSS for. Some provide only summary, some full content! If u set your RSS, means you make it available to public.
No sir, you are sadly mistaken. RSS is for syndication across the web and provides a convenient way for readers to subscribe to your content on almost any desktop or mobile platform RSS is NOT, for you to take other people's content to populate your website with articles.If you need content for YOUR website, WRITE YOUR OWN STUFF ! Who do you think you are to just take other people's stuff? What makes you think you are justified taking someone else's hard work and knowledge to claim as your own content and attempt to make money from it via ads and affiliate links ? It's a misuse of the technology to steal content. There is no other word for it. It is content theft. ESPECIALLY, when you are taking the entire article without the permission of the person who owns it. OBVIOUSLY, if people set their RSS feeds for "Excerpt", or block them all together...it is not intended for the content to be reproduced in it's entirety or at all. So, there are no other words for it other than straight out content theft, and copyright infringement. What do you call it? I don't want you to use. I don't give you permission. I have set it up so that it cannot be used in it's entirety. Yet you have decided that you are going to take it anyway. That's not theft? In the real world that we all live in, that would get you a prison sentence or a butt kicking or both. Just because you can hide your identity online, doesn't make it O.K. You are still no different from any other thief or scammer walking around in our society. I can't believe people talk about it so freely around here and actually ask for help to set one up, as if it's not a total dirt bag, black hat shortcut that other webmasters HATE. To me it's like posting a thread "Can anyone tell me how to hot wire a 2007 Honda Civic and disable the factory alarm ?" Instead it's"Can anyone show me how to bypass another webmasters settings and steal his content?" I mean c'mon. Seriously?! You are actually asking other bloggers how to help you steal their content. Really. Doesn't that seem like a total lack absence of any basic intelligence? Is there anything else that could scream "DESPERATE NOOB" more than that? Why don't you just walk into a police station and announce that you are about to steal a car and ask for their help? How do you see any difference? What, because it's online? You want a car. You are too lazy to get a job and earn the money to buy one. There is one sitting there on the street out in the open. So you just take it. Same difference on the web. You want niche content and articles. You are too lazy to write your own and too cheap to pay someone to do it. You see other sites with content. So you just take it. All of it. Whether they want you to or not. What's the difference? Why do you think corporations sue people left and right for content theft and copyright infringement and why"auto bloggers" steer clear of those sites? If they really though there was no problem with what they were doing, "auto bloggers" would be scraping The New York Times, and Washington Post all over the internet, but they don't ..do they? Because they know. You are still the annoying plague of the internet that everyone else looks down on, and laughs at your lack of skills to do your own work and build a successful website based on your own hard work and knowledge. We know that you don't know what you are doing and lack the intellect or drive to learn. We know that you are looking for shortcuts. We know that you will be gone soon and your websites will go unattended, only to be constantly replaced by more noobs attempting the same black hat tricks. If content thieves and "autobloggers" are so sure that their methods are justified, why is it that they never claim their websites, use their real names, or have a contact form or email on their websites? Why do blogging platforms kick them off of their networks? Why do people sue them? Why do hosting companies fold when a complaint is made about a content thief on their servers?..and back the complainant, not the customer. Because they know what they are doing is not just frowned upon, it is pissing people off enough to want to find them and kick their ass and everyone else on web knows it too. That's why. By the way adbox, that was a really good analogy.
sorry. i dont have time reading your nonsense. im here to learn tips and tricks. not to become a PRIEST. godd.. ur so annoying
I know you read it, or else you wouldn't have responded, and I know you get it. The truth is annoying when you don't want to hear it.
i read only the first 2 lines. Before i created this thread, i did some search about autoblog plugin. And i found ur post preaching this guy about the same autoblogging thing. man.. ur depressing person.
Why am I depressing, because I hate content thieves and people trying to act like auto blogging is legitimate? What's depressing is every other thread on this forum is someone asking about autoblogging. They should just name the "Blogging" section, "Autoblogging" because that's all anyone want to know about: "How do I do this without actually having to do it?" It's ridiculous. It's actually sad.
I have to agree, if you cant write descent content, then blogging isn't where you should be. Same as if you couldn't tell a spark plug from a tail light you shouldn't be a mechanic.
Sorry for the long quote but I agree with this sentiment entirely. Full auto will not work for long or at all to generate sustainable results. Taking all content without attribution is foolish. Google still loves aggregators. In the end the lions will come out on top Use RSS abstracts to be an agregator and you will be on the write track to get traffic to your content. The traffic you send to the content owners blogs will be appreciated and give you the opportunity to get them to guest post on your site which has given me and the blogger great results. I also have a few sites which i resyndicate with permission because i asked nicely, if you do ask you will be amazed at how many people will say yes... If you like autoblogging look at affiliate networks that have product feeds you can import, eg amazon, pepper jam, ebay etc etc build this kind of sites in the right niches and you will make good ROI per site in way that is easy, repeatable and ethical. All that said i would guess it is the autoblogged.com plugin I guess i would sum it up like this I would like to do auto blogging but i choose to spend time on the things that make relaible money instead. Consider the sustainability of your ROI and repeatability
I don't mean to sound like a raving lunatic here. And I enjoy helping other bloggers and webmasters with the issues and problems that I had when I first started. I got a lot of knowledge from this forum..that being said: We all do some kind of automation. Myself included. But when we are getting to the point of just taking whole articles and using them for all of your content..that's just out of control. It's just automated copying and pasting. Never mind the fact that autoblogging is an archaic concept from 5 years ago, and it will do nothing for you in the SERP's. Not to mention it's one of the main reasons that search engines adjusted thier algorythms to reward original and new content and penalize duplicate content. Taking full articles is just too much. It has gone too far.
It is an autoblog. If you Google any of the articles, you will see that they are posted all over the Internet.
Yeah, I know that now, that's why I got so inflamed. "Autoblog" is a nice way of saying it. If you are taking full articles and posting them as content, that is just stealing. Like I said, no different from copying and pasting. It's those type of websites that are going to ruin it for everyone and make everyone associate that term, with sites like that.