what are you talking about....I never said anything about people not being allowed to have sex....its fine as long as you're married....
The problem is most people lose the interest in sex after they are married (at least with each other). It is like enjoying a big mac once in awhile and then being forced to eat it everyday.
I beg to differ; I think this is the common outcome but some couples are still sexually very active even after 20 years. My favourite aunt and uncle, a beautiful, madly in love and also incredibly open minded couple have been married 22 years, are both in their 40s, and very much in love, affectionate and sexual still. I hope I'm like that
Sorry, I was out yesterday and the like, but I'm here now They're both, like myself, very into BDSM - although he tends to be the submissive one in the couple. They regularly have parties with like minded people, wear their leather gear, etc. The perfect sexual relationship in my mind involves more than just sex, it involves all three "basic" kinds of sex, ("normal", oral, anal,) and then it incorporates stuff like BDSM, roleplaying, etc. So many married couples don't have sex and I find that a great tragedy - I believe that when you find that one special person you want to be with forever and ever that the sex should be mind blowingly orgasmic because you are in love - you should be able to say to the other person exactly what you want to do and then have them help you do it, and vice versa. Ideally once I am married I will be able to wake my husband up in the middle of the night because I feel like getting into it and just say "Spanking and sex?" and have him oblige - I'd hope that he felt he could do the same with me
wow! This topic is turning into sex stories rather than a religious view of sex as far as my religion is concerned there are no barriers, have safe sex and be safe, simple if u don't follow vatsaya's kama sutra the famous one written down you can find books in major book stalls
Love > Sex > Money > Everything else. PS -I'm not religious, but your religion doesn't sound half bad masterrio.
BDSM was never really my cup of tea. I can do it as part of role playing if it turns on my partner but that's about it. I personally like orgies, some how sex is much more fun when you have 3-4 girls in bed instead of one. It is interesting that you like anal, it seems some women love it and others just hate it, no middle ground. As a woman what do you think is the reason?
Heh, well, I think that there are two reasons women don't like or wont have anal sex. 1) If you are not 100% relaxed and turned on by your partner, or he isn't careful, it can be very painful - you need to be excited, totally at ease and comfortable, start slow, then yes - drive it on home, lol. 2) Ultimately, anal sex is rarely totally clean; some "mess" is likely to occur, even if it is like, tiny - it's still awkward for most people. There is also the issue that it's most probable that some kind of erm, let's just say small "emissions" can occur, what with the ramming/removal and all. The only way this can be avoided is with total and absolute confidence that your partner is comfortable with you, and this - plus you can always do it in the shower. I'm not as into BDSM as I used to be, I'm still not into vanilla sex though - DP, spanking, some dirty talk - that kind of thing works just as well. BDSM is ultimately too much effort most of the time. Nothing at all wrong with orgies; but being practical one needs a fetish that they can easily indulge in at home with their partner without making arrangements previously. I will say this for anal, it's a very submissive position - it's also unconventional - so really you need to want to feel vulnerable and dominated for it to work; otherwise your mind can get too caught up in things and you wont be chilled out enough. Never hurts to be drunk, either ^-^;
I'm not too religious type character, I respect all religions and their deities, so if my religion would trouble me some where I can show my self as an example for some other In my view religion has nothing to do with sex, no religion is going to stop you from having sex or having kids as far am I concerned for me the least important is sex, I am not against any one on this and you are open to oppose me, but that's how I am, and that's how things are going to work with me. I would prefer my importance as this : Love (to my friends and parents) > Money > social concern/donor (to poor and lower classes) > love (to partner) > sex > rest crap
Wow. Your partner is less important than your friends, family and money? :S It's only one step away from being worthless, or "rest crap". My love for my partner is first, sex is second because sex is a wonderful way to express your love, to experience the greatest physical feeling known to wo/man and to do something you cannot do with anyone else. I've got to tell you man, if your love of your partner really is after money and love of friends/family, you aren't exactly cut out for a relationship with anyone :S A partner is someone who shares your life and supports you unconditionally; you build your futures together - how would you feel if you were married and the girl loved you less and thought you were less important than her friends?
When did this turn into talk about anal....? I don't remember somebody ever starting that....haha its funny how discussions can escalate and completely change.....
love to partner is an issue to be discussed about, love to partner can't be expressed in words according to hindu customs, husband and wife are half of each other, so I don't think you need to see my importance theory wise, its just mentioned for extra CCA and not the regular proceedings my parents include my partner,as I expect my partner to act as a daughter to my parents and not as a daughter-in-law, I am not saying in terms of relation as she would become my sister then for me my parents and friends are most important (excluding wife, my wife is already half of me, so don't expect me to quote this at all stages ), as they were the ones who stood next to me when needed and just because my wife doesn't like that, is going to bring about a change in my relationship with them (even though she is half of me, I don't expect her to be out of expressions and views, she will have her own freedom, I am not going to lock her self as a suppressor) I am more of socio freak - some one who likes to help the needy, I need cash for that, so money is second most important having lots of money just to show up myself isn't my way of things,so I would help the poor and lower classes,so love towards them would be my next priority love towards partner means, the CCA just like visiting her friends and relatives, its not my top priority, but I am not going to neglect it I will make my schedule to fit it up I am not a big crazy sex maniac, so sex is never going to be on top of my list, sex is just a love making method, when you can express love in better ways, its not the most important according to me, I am not against having sex or against some one who might want sex 24/7 : all the rest crap are any how going to matter as per the necessities and requirements ps: the above expressed views are my personal views and they are not forcing any one to follow my methods
.... That doesn't line up with what you just said. If she's half of you you're either implying you don't love yourself as much as your parents or money so wont love her that much, or else you just contradicted yourself. Twice.
well to an extent you can say that I don't love myself as much as I love my parents there is a difference between loving a partner and love to partner, loving partner is same as loving myself, I love myself after my love towards my parents if you a much detailed graph, here you go love my parents -> love my self (includes my partner) -> love my friends -> money times -> help to poor -> love to partner (this reflects to all the CCA) -> sex -> rest crap I hope this data is much clear, as u were actually it looked as if u were trying to brain wash me I love my parents more than I love myself, that's simple and final, u like it or not that's up to you, my friends know it pretty well and I expect my partner to know it hard. I am not going to dump my parents some where and live some where else, if I am staying a particular location for more than an year, I would surely take my parents with me w.r. to their adjustment to their body adjustments, I might need to drop them off in my relatives house, if its a short time work like say 2yrs if they are unable to adjust to the climate general tendency of a regular Indian, is family comes first, we are not generally as western people, like moving out when you grow up, but we stick together, there are people who move out, but not the traditional culture around
I'm not trying to brainwash you I am aware that the family culture is different there; although there are some families like this in the West too. I just personally believe that a person should put their partner first as they devote their lives largely to each other, and that all else should be second. Maybe equal first, maybe. PS - Whoever gave me a silly red rep for the comment regarding why women aren't always into anal sex, I was simply responding to gworld's question. It wasn't some random thing >.<'
thanks, that sounds so appealing as it is coming from someone who http://www.free-press-release.com/n...s-invade-down-under-australia-1255045670.html