Science Believes That GOD IS, so why don't you?

**sits comfortably on his couch, holding a big bucket of popcorn and watches the show on amazement**

 

LOL. . .until my sides hurt.

 

funny guy.

 

Never thought I'd see Nehemiah start a sentence off with those words..

 

Thanks been comin' here a while!

I think everyone needs to stop talking all smart and Fight Clubish here, turn off your "Philosophical Text Filter" that your running all your paragraphs through before posting. Some of these debates going on know are just a "who sounds smarter and can come up with a wittier and DEEP come back that insults the other user"

Lets start here, what the fuck does the OP mean by "Science believes GOD IS?". He is what? Fat? Black? Gay? Not real?

 

Fat and black.

 

I thought a black president was enough

 

It is written, ". . .you shall see greater things than these. (John 1:50)"

Then why don't you "start here" by asking "the OP", directly, what he means by "Science Believes That GOD IS, so why don't you?"; or better yet go back and read (in this thread particularly), what "the OP" has already stated on the subject, instead of asking questions about "the OP" that make you seem as though you're a bigot ("He is what? Fat? Black? Gay? Not real?")? Are you a bigot?

 

It is written, " ...god does not exist. (Roman 5:48)"

 

But on the other hand, David the King has written. . .and it must have been really important, and/or gotten good to him, because he wrote it in two different places. . ."The fool has said in his heart, There is no GOD. (Psalm 14:1; 53:1)"
Remember Nietzsche!!!

 

...and Roman has wriiten, " ...King David was the fool. (Roman 6:13)"

 

I believe in GOD. Belief in GOD will help you to become as a perfect person in this world. (Gentleman?)

 

A belief in a make belief will drive one into insanity(ladies?). Do you not read history or current events? People of religion are crazy and murderers and child molesters, all one has to do is confess and all of that sin is wiped away,..until the next day for a fresh new sin Goes on and on.

We need a system or an organization to deprogram this people, by force if necessary.

 

I have a simple question for scientists. They says that nothing can be created or destroyed. Then How the first ever thing was created. Even they say its a big bang theory then how the first universe created?

 

No one really knows for sure and no one will ever find the truth to it as there was no recording when it happened, however Science can speculate or study on the matter. The findings are theorize unless someone can convince that that is how it happened and as of now that is more logical than the make belief that other insane people believe in that "it" created it in 6 days which to me sounds too much of fantasy coming from a poor minds.

The best and only ways to understand it is through Science as it is open to debate and can be contradicted time and time again until the next closest logical explanation comes for a debate. Call it Trial and Error, that is how modern society evolves. Those that relied on Fairy Tales are stuck in the distance only to rely on some fictionalize scrolls that was written sometime back in the past that should not be taken seriously because of no credible evidence and it is closed for debate.

 

1. it's the first law of thermodynamics that says energy can not be created or destroyed and, as the name suggests, this relates to the movement of heat around a closed system.

2. The big bang is a model explaining the expansion of the universe. It has never been used to explain where the universe came from, only it's expansion.

 

Another funny guy......

Its not Gods responsibility to control the people who are Christian they have free will do things wrong. You are blaming the religion becuase of what people did. The bible didn't tell them to do that so obviously. You think because some clowns do things wrong makes the whole religion wrong or something?
Seriously, what if one of them weared glasses. Does that mean that people with glasses are child molesters now?
Because that's what you are saying right now.

Also on top of that forget about the part about repenting and its over. It doesn't work that way because there is a consequence that goes with all wrong just the same as a benefit of good. Its like that for all people, no matter what religion.

You've already proven you know nothing about religion. I just got done quoting you because you blamed the whole religion based on what certian people do. There is more credidible evidence than you can imagine. It is science that is unreliable to the truth as it changes often.

 

Okay then; but given King David documented History, along side yours, its abundantly clear as to who "The fool" is.

1) You're on the right track, but...
2) Your premise is that all people have "A belief (faith) in a . . .belief ('religion')", is not necessarily the cards that are on the table; 3) you, like so many others operate on the premise that "religion", which is man-made, is GOD Ordained, when it is not (GOD never even ordained/sanctioned/approved "Christianity"). . .and you cannot find any approval of any "religion" in any and/or all of Scripture; and 4) JESUS CHRIST IS, not only able to save a person (any person. . .personally), but HE IS, equally, able to keep all those that HE Saves. . .no matter what they may do after Salvation.

Great point!!!. . .but please don't look for "ats/ags" to provide an answer. They just can't. . .so they'll attack you, The Messenger, instead of THE MESSAGE (JESUS CHRIST).

Sure there's a "recording". . .Genesis 1 (and 2); and for those of us who believe those passages, we allow unbelievers to demand that believers prove it, instead of them showing us that they can disprove it. . .but at the same time, we (and especially "ats/ags") accept and/or abide by the law (of mankind) that say a person is innocent (telling the TRUTH) until proven guilty (telling a lie). . .go figure. Am I "insane" because I believe that, "In the beginning, GOD Created the heavens and the earth.", rather than believing that all of what we perceive with one or more of our five senses happened merely by some supposed explosion. . .of substances that we (nor any of what they have "FREELY" chosen to believe) cannot be accounted for. . .even Scientifically? Can an unintellectual "big bang" create and/or account for intelligent humankind?

So then, who/what created the "Science" that you now put so much credence in?

So where does this "first law of thermodynamics that says energy can not be created or destroyed" comes from (it source). . .and after you have used/exhausted said un-created and indestructible/everlasting said "energy", where does/did it disappear to?

So where's your proof that there's actual "expansion of the universe"???, especially when we've not yet any verifiable proof of where the end of "universe" is, nor measure it precisely, so that we can know that your claimed "expansion" mode be so. . .or NOT?

Even though I may partially agree with you, I have to ask of you, why this is so?

Even though, like I often do, you may come off like the south-end of a northbound horse, you're beginning to make a lot of sense.
That anger management session that I gave you out in the woodshed seems to be paying off.

Good point, Dude!!!

GrAveTzT, you may still not like me, I care, but I won't lose any sleep over it; but this post, of yours, right here just impressed the heck out of me!!! You GO DUDE!!!

 

Don't use the mystery of the universe as your support for believing in one particular religion. The mystery supports Deism just as much, if not more, than any other man-made religion.

 

When will you learn/understand/know that I don't believe/ascribe to/practice any "religion" whatsoever. I peeped your hold card long ago, when I was shooting down all those supposed "contradictions" of Scripture that you were presenting, and determined you left "The Church" (JESUS CHRIST'S BODY), not because of HIM, but because of "religion".

BTW, JESUS CHRIST is not about ANY "religion". . .HE IS about RELATIONSHIP. Do you know/understand the difference???

But since I have your attention, once again, when JESUS CHRIST was talking to the reverend doctor scholar MA and/or phd (of the day) behind his name, Nicodemus, HE told him, "Except/Unless a man be born again, he cannot see/understand THE KINGDOM of GOD. (John 3:3)"; note that JESUS nowhere in their entire discourse (nor any Scriptural discourse of JESUS CHRIST) mentions "religion". . .and Nick was probably one of the most "religious" men on the Planet. Ergo, education is a good thing for earth, but when it come to understand GOD and THE THINGS of GOD, you've got to be "born again" into it.

"born again" implies RELATIONSHIP. . .NOT "religion".