Please, review my new site http://www.free-celebrity-desktop-wallpaper.com/ Any ways to improve users experience?
Is that how you spell Christina's name? Or is that intentional? Ignoring the benefits, from a user's perspective, not having the four images above the AdSense ad clickable is harsh. Footer: Center the links and get rid of the last pipe at the end. Lastly, I like the hearts at the bottom, but they end up getting buried under content. Move them up. Actually, now lastly, how about a short intro? It wouldn't have to be much, but you could reiterate your keywords ... Geez ... Last, there's an ugly left margin when you dig into the galleries on Firefox. This results in half the right-side of the image being pushed off screen. Without digging into the code, perhaps something left-over from the header? Nice colours, by the way.
Thanks for the advices, I noticed this issue in FireFox also... CSS and FireFox/IE.. you know little mess
Same margin problem in IE 7.0 RC 1, by the way. One other suggestion: thumbnails for the galleries perhaps? Getting a quick glance at images would be nice, again from a user's perspective.
I've fixed the CSS issue - one of the divs (over 4 divs before the actual content) had overlapping "align:right" Dont know how I've missed this I'm currently working on the thumbnail script and clickable images over the ads Thanks again
Just out of curiosity, is it legal to use those pics? Or does it come under some sort of fan site legal loop hole. Would be nice if the pics were higher quality. They look like scans from magazines. I like the homepage though. Those pics look just fine
I like the site - there is little between the content and the user which is what I like. Helps users find what they want immediately. It's very simple and straight to the point.
I like it! The design is awsome , Ads are blended and look good, quality content. Doesnt get any better!
To be honest I'd still email google and make sure your ads are legit, although there is that tiny line there, that I'd have to say is a little questionable... But it's just to play it safe. Other than that, I like it, except i'd recommend that the ads are initially smaller so they load faster then if you click them they grow up. This will just help those cromagnon's that still use the old school connections Sorry if either of these were already said, didn't read the previous comments
dastuff, I wrote to google days ago, everything seems to be ok with the images/bleding Brilliances, I found these images in similar "fan sites" - so I think there is no problem with them I have little more code to write to make thumbs and images next to ads clickable...
Looking at your website when you search through the image galleries I have to click "next" 232 (I made up the number but you do have a lot of pictures) times to get to the very end pictures. Wouldn't it be better for the user if you created smaller thumbnails and created a gallery with a link to each page? Its just a bit of a pain if I want to get to the very end pages. Not many people will click through all hundred pages that you have. I hope that makes sense.
Man, there is working BACK button edit and yes, I'm just finishing the thumbnails script (otherwise lotta handwork to do) edit2 OMFG check http://www.hallmark.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/product|10001|10051|127103|-2;-102001;11446;-102034;92055||P4R4SO|
Ammmm celebrity pics are good ... you need to more post Good celebrity pics... Anyway.. sites are good...
It's copyright infringement and if any of the photographers finds out, they can demand a usage fee of thousands of dollars per image - and that you then take them down. You always need permission to use a photograph you didn't take.
Yes, that's what i thought. But I guess if you're small fry and never intend for the site to be popular enough for the lawyers to bother then it should be fine.. but then you have to ask yourself, why make the site if you don't want it to be popular?