Supplemetal results even in mattcutts blog

I was checking mattcutts blog for some info, then this thing striked me

http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=site:www.mattcutts.com&num=100&hl=en&lr=&filter=0

Even his blog is not spared from having pages with supplemental results

 

Does that mean google thinks they are copied pages?

 

No even he can be a crappy webmaster

 

I bet he gets out of supplemental before me
Like, say, this afternoon...

 

If that has to happen, he should have had a look at this thread by now..

 

Forget that... just check out this link http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=site:www.GOOGLE.COM&num=100&hl=en&lr=&start=900&sa=N

what do you say ?

 

OMG........

 

Hehe! Google has made itself supp. I love it.

 

Does Google Sitemap really helps in avoiding the supplemental results ? can anybody have any insights on this ?

 

Can Site Map Really Help in coming out of suplimental results ? Can any body explain ?????????

 

Old wine in new bottle
Is that what seoengineer asked in a different way many minutes before you posted?

 

Awesome find, not that tells the supplement story. Everybody is at fault.

 

How can blogs be supplemental unless the content was not original right? Or did G not like Matt's content?

 

Don't forget that according to Cutts, if you have supplemental results its completely your fault (Not Googles)

 

Thats not only factor for a page to go supplemental.
If a page which was indexed earlier and now deleted without giving any 301 redirects / a navigation to the page is removed, supplemental results will appear.

 

well atleast it shows that they apply their rules uniformly so that they themselves can get affected by such things.

 

It shows how messed up the index is nowadays. Hope they get well soon.

 

Exactly.. Otherwise how come those two examples came out..

 

Old news;

http://forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=128463