Neat stunt... Five (5) SEO Excuses

Ohhh lets all run out and SEO for keywords nobody is searching for.....


Ohhh wait that is all SEO contests in existince......

Five SEO Excuses
are some losers way of whining that Google doesn't like them

redone

rehashed

burnt to a crisp

 

*Hint* Use that signature space if you got less than four links. *Hint*

 

To lazy to write, but this should do the trick

 

Now, if something were to happen to the number of links to each of the subdomains their message could get awfully screwed up!

After you discover the Five SEO Excuses you would have to question why a company offering SEO only has a PR of 4! I guess that they really do live by the Five SEO excuses

Now, if everyone here were to put the Sub-domain for excuse 4 in their sig for a week, we could totally screw up the SERPS and the order of their message.....

So, To help things off, five seo excuses should get things started -

Look at the sub-domains on the SERPS, how about not only geting this thread into the those 5, but also influence the order of those!

 

Any one remember Costa Dedes??

http://www.google.com/search?q=Costa+Dedes

Ack...DP is #2 now!!!!

Yes, I'm still waiting for those papers.

 

This is the best site for Five SEO Excuses I have ever seen!

 

Dedes?? That clown who claimed that he will take one thread about him on DP down ?

 

I've posted a blog entry over at SEO and Stuff about this topic. It details the differences and similarities between the diferent pages and how he achieved the ranking order.

DP is your source for the Five SEO Excuses

 

I think we should start putting some affiliate ads on this thread now. Rack it in from our soon to be top listing of Five SEO Excuses

 

And he never did!!!

 

Verry interesting.
The message written by the subdomains is funny:

you.ajaxle.com/
should.ajaxle.com/
switch.ajaxle.com/
to.ajaxle.com/
virante.ajaxle.com/

How did you manage to get your pages listed in Google in the right order ?

Alex

 

For someone noticing the value of getting 5 sites to rank in a particular order. Nothing is impressive about ranking for non-competetive terms, but to get them to rank in the exact order is substantially more difficult.

Well, basically there were several steps...

Take about 5 on-site optimization factors (h1-h5 tags, key in title, key in meta, key in bold, key in italics, etc...) and vary them such that the first has the highest term weight and the last has the lowest.

Then, inner link them such that the last links to all 1-4, the fourth to 1-3, and so on and so forth, such that the first site has the most inbound links in the series.

Finally, link to all the sites from one separate site with the links in order such that the first link appearing on the outbound linking page is to #1, the second link is #2 and so on and so forth.

It worked like a charm.

 

so this was you who did it..?

Seems like you didnt mention all things you used.. checkout my blog maybe for more indepth information about these pages.

 

Uhhhh klown when did you work for Google to be able to say how those pages were ranked???

Your use of "supposition" is not factual basis for anything.

In fact how about you write down the 100+ parts of the Google algorithim for all of us.......

klown fits as a nic it seems lol

 

i was merely saying he didnt really even mention all the things that were done on the page. The way hes writing it looks like he is saying he actually made the sites and marketed them.

 

Simple SEO companies should be dismissed if they guarantee 1st place rankings i a search engine especially if they say forever.

 

How nice, rjonesx is grouping us here as "idiots with no real life"... isn't that sweet.

-Michael

 

good to hear i guess.. least i got a list of five seo excuses which doesnt include the following five seo secrets "No press is bad press" which is applicable both to the idiocy of AOL and the greatness of DP. no excuses to not make dp the master of these kewords.

 

No, that's someone else who's doing the grouping if you read your link.

I've no idea who these folks are but:
- they did do a fantastic job doing this. Scammers or not, this is a very cool thing they pulled off.
- you're clearly stalking them all over the internet. That's fine, except it doesn't seem like anyone else is sharing your concerns. That makes you look like the troublemaker, not them.

 

Whatever. Exactly where is this all over the internet stalking going on? I was asked to digg the link, noticed it was them. As to the comment, I was just matching up his reply with the subject of what he was replying to.

As for the concept itself, he used the power of a sitewide link from a 4 year old PR6 site and combined it with a recently discovered spam exploit using subdomains.

I admit, 10 out of 10 for creativeness. It's a gimmick though. I wouldn't go so far as to call it a useful tactic for anything they would actually do for a customer.

-Michael