So now, not supporting the troops means I want them all to die? Another nice way of twisting reality into fitting your own agenda of attacking me personally. Keep going, you've got all the 15 year olds tingling with joy!
.... 16 ...! You have one more chance to stop ignoring what I've been repeatedly bringing up. If you don't, it is DEFINITELY proof that you are ignorant and your posts don't actually matter in this forum...
We've been over this before. I'm still waiting (for days now) on you to finish answering my questions.
This is going in circles, yo-yo. I already have. You added things onto the question and tweaked them afterward to make it seem like I didn't answer them because you know you don't LIKE the answer to them. And that's it. You're officially and forever ignorant.
Sounds a lot like you. Still no answer to my question about what freedoms you have lost that this "country USED to have?" Don't you have some more community service/trash pick ups to attend?
Will the OWNING every stop? At this point, I would just save face and walk away. I'm almost starting to feel sorry for you now.
That would be Question #1, which I thought "proven" made it clear. After you failed to realise what "proven" means, I added it in for you. Did I miss your answer to Question #2? I'm yet to see any definitions that included fetuses and embryos as children (or babies, gtech). Wow. You sure know how to make things official!
Then apparently you are blind, because I have said, that no matter the definition of those, abortion is the killing of a human being. Liberals sure make things progress very well! We've been going in circles!
That's the only you disagree with now, huh? Good that you are coming around... but let's follow this train for a little while. You do not support the troops (accepted) Therefore you do not support the mission (accepted from other threads) You want the mission to fail. I think this is also established. So, in order for the mission to fail; many soldiers must be killed. Therefore, you want as many troops to die as possible. Following me? Just because you don't say you want them to die, doesn't mean you don't think it. Glad you see my point. Thanks!
Examples? Examples? And if "their programs" were "struck down", again, how has this caused you to lose any single freedom you "USED" to have? They have? Who? Again, examples... Who is this "they"? I think SD hit the nail on the head with his use of the word "ambiguity" where as a yo-yo is concerned.
It doesn't surprise me at all. After all, once again, in this very thread, he defended known terrorists by suggesting something hadn't been "proven" in a court, while being the first (as usual) to blanket convict our troops without even a trial. So, to summarize, (as I've pointed out time and again), yo-yo only cares about the Constitution when it comes to the rights of terrorists, he demands trials for terrorists before anyone can say a bad word about them, and like democrats (johns murtha and kerry), he convicts our troops without even a trial. The very people that he steals freedoms from, he wants to convict them without a trial, but known terrorists get a pass. This is what happens when parents don't give their kids enough attention
There's your problem. Apparently you have trouble thinking. I don't want the mission to fail, it has already failed and is continue to fail each and every single day. Just because I'm able to acknowledge the truth, doesn't mean I want it to fail. Any other "thinking" you need corrected today?
It is not the truth though, which is what makes me upset about how you are so ignorant about things. You twist the truth.
Keep saying it and the 15 year olds will believe it. Is that your new philosophy? As evidence shows here it's working pretty well
Well, we're not terrorists, so it probably won't be forthcoming. Terrorism apologists don't usually like "our" kind, ya know