The 200 Variables of Google Ranking - It is much more then pagerank

it's very helpful list
i agree everything is very important
that we should consider

 

vry true! popel care only aboyr PR today, which has no effect on the position in google results

 

Here are some more to add that others have posted about

I think some of those may be the final effect of specific factors, rather than being factors on their own. Here are some ideas I've had:

1. History of past penalties for this domain
2. History of past penalties for this owner
3. Semantic information (phrase-based indexing and co-occurring phrase indicators)
4. Taxonomy flag for general category (transactional, informational, navigational)
5. Taxonomy flag for freshness
6. Taxonomy flag for market niche

Probably some of the stuff left over from the old days is still in usage:
- Word emphasis (bold, italics, underline)
- positioning of most relevant words on page
- synonyms relating to theme of page/site
- alt tags / graphic file names / promimity of graphics to supporting text

 

Ha ha

Started with a wrong point - Age of domain.
Well you need to watch what Matt Cutts have said about Domain age
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1_1NQWQJ2Q

 

i dont believe that these 200 factors mentioned here is true.First of all onpage optimazation is about 3% maybe less(competitive keywords ofcourse) then next thing you've got is backlinks.Now i think that googles 200 factors are around backlinks and their natural condition.
From my experience sites that have irrelavent links tent to rank well cause of the internal dynamic after the pageranks get high,sites that have relavent links are ranking well even if pagerank is lower.IMO links transfer keywords not only by anchor text but also from the surounding text.A lot of the 200 factors are dealing with the naturality of the link.Thats why we see a lot of strange things regarding link building.

 

I disagree with your statement, sure some of these factors may weigh very lightly on ranking but they still help. On page optimization is much more then 3% but ether way it is still a factor and quality backlinks with quality anchors is one of the most important factors. The problem here is that to many people tend to concentrate on pagerank which get's them nowhere without using other factors mentioned. I believe the list (which I did not write) is a good solid basis to go by.

 

@Barre Tire excuse me let me correct my post i believe that these factors are true but not so important.i am always speaking for competitive keywords.more competitive keyword more weight to backlinks.IMO always cause seo is an ongoing process

 

I agree with that statement.

 

Do you really think Google penalizes for comments spamming?