Tragedy or Scandal? We weaseled and equivocated and appeased. Shortly after 9/11, there was a lot of talk about how no one would ever hijack an American airliner ever again — not because of new security arrangements but because an alert citizenry was on the case: We were hip to their jive. The point appeared to be proved three months later on a U.S.-bound Air France flight. The “Shoebomber†attempted to light his footwear, and the flight attendants and passengers pounced. As the more boorish commentators could not resist pointing out, even the French guys walloped him. But the years go by, and the mood shifts. You didn’t have to be “alert†to spot Maj. Nidal Hasan. He’d spent most of the last half-decade walking around with a big neon sign on his head saying “JIHADIST. STAND WELL BACK.†But we (that is to say, almost all of us — and certainly almost anyone who matters in national security and the broader political culture) are now reflexively conditioned to ignore the flashing neon sign. Like those apocryphal Victorian ladies discreetly draping the lasciviously curved legs of their pianos, if a glimpse of hard unpleasant reality peeps through we simply veil it in another layer of fluffy illusions. Two joint terrorism task forces became aware almost a year ago that Major Hasan was in regular e-mail contact with Anwar al-Awlaqi, the American-born but now Yemeni-based cleric who served as imam to three of the 9/11 hijackers and supports all-out holy war against the United States. But the expert analysts in the Pentagon determined that this lively correspondence was consistent with Major Hasan’s “research interests,†so there was no need to worry. That’s America: Technologically superior, money no object (not one but two “joint terrorism task forces†stumbled across him). Yet no action was taken. On the other hand, who needs surveillance operations and intelligence budgets? Major Hasan was entirely upfront about who he was. He put it on his business card: “SOA.†As in “Soldier of Allah†— which seems a tad ungrateful to the American taxpayers who ponied up half a million bucks or thereabouts in elite medical-school education to train him to be a Soldier of Uncle Sam. In a series of meetings during 2008, officials from both Walter Reed and the Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences considered the question of whether then-captain Hasan was psychotic. But, according to at least one bigwig at Walter Reed, members of the policy committee wondered “How would it look if we kick out one of the few Muslim residents?†So he got promoted to major and shipped to Fort Hood. And 13 men and women and an unborn baby are dead. Well, like they say, it’s easy to be wise after the event. I’m not so sure. These days, it’s easier to be even more stupid after the event. “Apparently he tried to contact al-Qaeda,†mused MSNBC’s Chris Matthews. “That’s not a crime to call up al-Qaeda, is it? Is it? I mean, where do you stop the guy?†Interesting question: Where do you draw the line? The truth is we’re not prepared to draw a line even after he’s gone ahead and committed mass murder. “What happened at Fort Hood was a tragedy,†said Gen. George Casey, the U.S. Army’s Chief of Staff, “but I believe it would be an even greater tragedy if our diversity becomes a casualty here.†A “greater tragedy†than 14 dead and dozens of wounded? Translating from the original brain-addled multicult-speak, the Army chief of staff is saying that the same fatuous prostration before marshmallow illusions that led to the “tragedy†must remain in place. If it leads to occasional mass murder, well, hopefully it can be held to what cynical British civil servants used to call, during the Northern Irish “Troubles,†“an acceptable level of violence.†Fourteen dead is evidently acceptable. A hundred and forty? Fourteen hundred? I guess we’ll find out. “Diversity†is one of those words designed to absolve you of the need to think. Likewise, a belief in “multiculturalism†doesn’t require you to know anything at all about other cultures, just to feel generally warm and fluffy about them. Heading out from my hotel room the other day, I caught a glimpse of that 7-Eleven video showing Major Hasan wearing “Muslim†garb to buy a coffee on the morning of his murderous rampage. And it wasn’t until I was in the taxi cab that something odd struck me: He was an American of Arab descent. But he was wearing Pakistani dress — that’s to say, a “Punjabi suit,†as they call it in Britain, or the shalwar kameez, to give it its South Asian name. For all the hundreds of talking heads droning on about “diversity†across the TV networks, it was only Tarek Fatah, writing in the Ottawa Citizen, who pointed out that no Arab males wear this get-up — with one exception: Those Arab men who got the jihad fever and went to Afghanistan to sign on with the Taliban and al-Qaeda. In other words, Major Hasan’s outfit symbolized the embrace of an explicit political identity entirely unconnected with his ethnic heritage. Mr. Fatah would seem to be a genuine “multiculturalistâ€: That’s to say, he’s attuned to often very subtle “diversities†between cultures. Whereas the professional multiculturalist sees the 7-Eleven video and coos, “Aw, look. He’s wearing . . . well, something exotic and colorful, let’s not get hung up on details. Celebrate diversity, right? Can we get him in the front row for the group shot? We may be eligible for a grant.†The brain-addled “diversity†of General Casey will get some of us killed, and keep all of us cowed. In the days since the killings, the news reports have seemed increasingly like a satirical novel the author’s not quite deft enough to pull off, with bizarre new Catch 22s multiplying like the windmills of your mind: If you’re openly in favor of pouring boiling oil down the throats of infidels, then the Pentagon will put down your e-mails to foreign jihadists as mere confirmation of your long established “research interests.†If you’re psychotic, the Army will make you a psychiatrist for fear of provoking you. If you gun down a bunch of people, within an hour the FBI will state clearly that we can all relax, there’s no terrorism angle, because, in our over-credentialized society, it doesn’t count unless you’re found to be carrying Permit #57982BQ3a from the relevant State Board of Jihadist Licensing. Ezra Levant, my comrade in a long battle to restore freedom of speech to Canada, likes to say that the Danish cartoons crisis may one day be seen as a more critical event than 9/11. Not, obviously, in the comparative death tolls but in what each revealed about the state of Western civilization. After 9/11, we fought back, hit hard, rolled up the Afghan camps; after the cartoons, we weaseled and equivocated and appeased and signaled that we were willing to trade core Western values for a quiet life. Watching the decadence and denial on display this last week, I think in years to come Fort Hood will be seen in a similar light. What happened is not a “tragedy†but a national scandal, already fading from view. source
Not every Arab american contacts Al-quada, diversity should not be in questioned its the people who contact al-quada who should be questioned, whoever they are.
Mark Steyn who is the author of this article is an idiot like some of the posters here. The supporter of his nonsense like Gtech,... has already disappeared from this forum after the American people put Bush and his ideas in the garbage can of history. It is time to put people like Steyn in the same garbage can.
Here's an idea. Maybe instead of just declaring the author and everyone that agrees with them "idiots"... perhaps you could point out something in the post with which you disagree and explain why.
I just twigged, oh damn I missed the point before. A few days ago there was a video showing him in Muslim clothes and everyone made a fuss, I didn't get it until now. He was wearing a flipping Jihadist jump suit
i noticed two part of the article that presents us with the real question. was he becoming a terrorists and they missed it or was he going crazy and they missed it or both
The tragedy at Fort Hood seems to have sparked many discussions about the merits of political correctness.
Both. I watched a shrink analyzing it and, according to him, it is a chicken/egg situation. People with these kind of psychological problems are drawn to radical ideas. Which happened first in his case would be hard to tell. I found it comforting and disturbing, at the same time, to know we are fighting a bunch of lunatics. The good news is, since these Jhadists are mentally deficient, natural selection will eventually kill them off, even if Obama decides it isn't worth it. I think I'll crack myself a beer to that thought.
Well it wouldn't of been politically incorrect to question or possibly fire him then would it, just another case of incompetency from the administration and army.
Neither. He'd accepted a free medical education courtesy of the US Army and now wanted to skip the obligation of performing the duties he agreed to when he accepted that. He shouldve been transferred to a 1 man station in the Antarctic to do research on penguin migration for the duration of his service... let him preach jihad to them all he wants while reflecting on what an ungrateful dumbass he is to bite the hand that fed him.