Looking for the best way to host multiple sites on different C classes. Anyone recommend a good service to do this with?
for example, if you have 2 sites and you are doing a backlink to another site (all in the Same C class or IP ) SearchEngines will detect it and penalize the rank. well im not a SEO master , i know just some basics, maybe someone can explain it better. Rgds
I'd just buy a bunch of different hosting accounts around the net. Google has got to know where the SEO hosting servers are by now. Remember the uplink is going through the same IP address of the router.
I would agree with this. Just use numerous different hosting accounts. You could even purchase a dedicated IP for each different site.
You can get a dedicated server with multiple C class IP with a proper justification. Usually come with /24 (253 use able IP) We did have a client which bought this from us for his/her SEO business.
It's still going through the same uplinked router. If Google and the other search engines haven't figured that out yet, they will some day.
I don't see if routing become a problem on SEO itself as you get multiple C class IP of which they are from diff. subnet. Excuse me for my lack of knowledge in this but most of SEO hoster out there either using 3-5 server only or even 1 with C class IP assign to a single server. Thats is the reason they offer C class IP for dedicated server right?
I'd suggest going over to www.webhostingtalk.com taking a look through the list find as many different hosts as you want from different DCs, it'd be the most effective way.
If you are interested, i can offer you hosting a/cs on 2 servers with different DCs and C class IP's at $10/year/ac. Reach me at expertwebhost[at]gmail.com for more info.
Think SEO dedicated servers help you much to solve your issues, the OP. I recommend you to try webcs.com, they provide small sets of IPS, each coming from their own C-class, which allows you to customize your websites for search engine consumption.
Where on earth did you hear bullshit like that? That's a myth. If that were really the case don't you think the SE would also detect that the Class C's, even though from different Subnets are still also part of the same AS ? SEO basics? Rgds, someone has fed you a line of shit. This is simply not true. The reality here is that Web Hosting Providers created this false claim in order to sell you more IP's at a premium thus making more money off the false idea that google smacks PR based on locale. Do you even realize the collateral damage that would result if google really did this? You do realize that literally thousands of SEO's host at various popular web hosts, all on the same group of IP's, servers, subnets and AS's. That said, it stands to reason that if google penalized sites for being on the same IP, they would likely end up penalizing sites that were not even related to one another but just happened to be hosting on the same IP and or netblock as other SEO hosted sites. I'm here to tell you as a web host, that spreading sites out among different IP's on different class c's makes absolutely NO difference whatsoever to google or any other SE for that matter. They simply do not care.
Conclusion is, its a bull shit statement. Trust me, the whole Class C hosting thing was born out of the industry I am in; web hosting. It was created not by SEO's but by web hosts in order to bilk ignorant wannabe SEO's out of their money by offering IP addresses as a value added service.
I guess you are a lil bit wrong there it does give impact on seo there. I will provide you to the link to google blog saying it does give 40% of bla bla bla.. I just happen to read something when I browse the net. I'll edit post later with the link if I can find it again =.=!!...
Why say you will provide me with proof via a "link" and then not do it? Guys, seriously... this Class C IP hosting thing is a way to make more off selling IP's to you, not a way of improving SEO. Again, if google gives a rats ass about the IP then they will care about the proximity of that IP to other similar IP's, though not the same, or perhaps not even from the same block, they are still from the same or similar subnet. Using this logic, you'd literally have to get IP's that are listed in completely dis-similar netblocks hosted on completely dis-similar networks, and completely different ASN's... I'm telling you, its bunk!