Angela Backlink - Do they really work? - Case study

hey,

Due to a lot of speculation of whether angela backlinks work or not, I am thinking of conducting a case study to see whether they really work or not. I will Submit my site as given in her PDfs to 60-70 sites in 2-3 days.

Also, I will ping my profile so that they get indexed quickly and time is not wasted on waiting to see when google sees them. I'll also watch yahoo at the same time to see the effect.

The site I am targeting is my Digg.

http://digg.com/health/8_ideas_to_keep_your_kids_busy_Herbally
Keyword: How to keep a kid busy

The keyword is quite competitive, and is perfect to see whether these links can bring my digg to the first page.

I digg the page today itself and have already submitted my site to 10-12 high authority profile links With the same anchor text. Right now, It impossible to say that I am seeing any change p) but it will be interesting to know how this turns up.

Let me know if I have missed anything here. Would like you point of view and comments plus suggestions.

We should see the results in 7-10 days.

Lets keep our fingers crossed.

pro-

 

I hade 4 sites that I used angelas backlinks on. I used a lot and used Pauls too. All my sites went to PR 4 after 2 months but I think because I used so many that they're in the sandbox now.

 

lol....Over doing of things are not good.

 

I haven't tried it myself, but I think you're definitely on to something here. Give is spin and let us know how it goes. Again, I think your keyword is more or less a long tail and will be easy to rank for.

Good luck

 

I would be interested to know how long it talks to get those sites indexed and what you might have tried to get them indexed (not your article but the backlinks).

 

I'm sorry, but I'll have to disagree that your key phrase is competitive. According to Google keyword tool, and SEM rush, there isnt a single other website on the planet that has that exact keyphrase in the title of the page.

Not one.

Not only that, but it's almost never searched for.

That indicates to me that this is a very, very, very non-competitive keyphrase.

So the results of your case study would be inconclusive. We already know that you can rank well on a non-competitive SERP with only on page optimization.

 

But It has 465,000,000 competition

 

Not for the phrase search ...

Results 1 - 10 of about 22,700 for "How to keep a kid busy". (0.30 seconds)

 

You're looking at search results, not competition. not a single one of these resutls are optimized for that phrase. Look at all of the titles returned. Not a single one of them has that exact phrase in the title.

And according to Google, it's never searched for. So even if you got to the top of that serp, you'd never get any traffic from it.

Now, if you pair it down to 'keep kids busy', then you'll at least have a little competition. There are at least a few pages that are optimized for that phrase, and it gets searched for 1300 times per month globally.

 

Yeah, not to mention, you're already in the top spot ofr "How to keep a kid busy" (with quotes)
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&...=fYx&q="How+to+keep+a+kid+busy"&aq=f&oq=&aqi=

See how easy it is to get the top spot of a non-competitive SERP without doing anything except for on page optimization? BTW, this thread is already 3rd in that result.

 

You are right. I should have selected a more competitive keyword

 

I've heard that it's better to not ping the sites as Google finding them naturally is less likely to raise any suspicion. Any thoughts on this?

 

pinging is good, wp does pinging to pingomatic automatically when you post (by default). and it would be impossible for google to crawl all the pages because in many cases there are no links pointing to your profile pages (which you make on high pr sites (with this method))... you don't ping your site, so you don't have to worry...

 

this is a bad example like the above poster said there is no competition of that exact phrase anywhere. its simple to rank on page one for that phrase.

 

I guess I am on the first page within a day for the key word I was targeting. Thats wasn't tough, but this shows those links work and now I will use it for a more competitive keyword. Let me come up with something and I will update the thread soon.

 

I disagree, I think that proves you on page optimization works. I think you'd have gotten to the first page with just a simple ping.

 

i never try that angela and paul method.I don't have much time to create account on many social site.Pagerank is counted by rank on each page,not only on homepage.So...if your profile doesn't have a rank,it's not make a big change with your pagerank

 

here our main motive is to get to the 1# page. Getting to the first page has more value then getting a PR3 or PR4 for instance. Traffic is more important. Please keep that in mind.

 

If traffic is the most important thing, then we should absolutly find a phrase that is searched for more often.

This phrase is searched for less than 10 times per month, globally.

In other words, being at the top of this search brings in no traffic whatsoever.

 

Well not in terms of the keyword I choose to do the case study. But targeting more competitive keywords and then coming up on the first page is what most webmasters and site owners desire.

PR is just a perk one gets while promoting a site.