Is This A Ridiculous Request????

Discussion in 'Keywords' started by COMS, Oct 28, 2009.

  1. #1
    I saw this posted somewhere and my initial research says this is just not realistic to expect.

    *** Start Request ***

    3 keywords to first page of Google/Yahoo search results
    No black hat.

    keywords:
    submit url
    web directory
    submit website

    I need to have come up in the google top 10 within 30 days
    45 Days in the worst case!

    *** End Request ***

    These terms have millions of competitors and more importantly, the PR on average for page 1 SERPs is 5.

    They also expect the results to stay there for 3 months.

    In addition, these are rather short tail keyword phrases. I would have liked to advise them of their unrealistic request but wasn't allowed (not important why, but point remains).

    What do you peeps think????

    Best,

    Michael
     
    COMS, Oct 28, 2009 IP
  2. Tommyguns

    Tommyguns Peon

    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    Yup truly ridiculous, you know that thoough already eh.

    If it has millions of competitors your not getting it in the top 100 in that time, unless you got some bare gots connections.
     
    Tommyguns, Oct 28, 2009 IP
  3. openmindz

    openmindz Active Member

    Messages:
    331
    Likes Received:
    7
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    58
    #3
    If you had to even ask....

    I'm not sure why someone would make a demand that no one could guarantee to fulfill. SEM isn't about flash in the pan tactics.

    I will tell you one thing, and that is although the request is ridiculous..it is not unreasonable. Dependent upon what those keywords are, it is quite possible.
     
    openmindz, Oct 28, 2009 IP
  4. spice

    spice Active Member

    Messages:
    549
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    58
    #4
    what is bare gots connections?
     
    spice, Oct 28, 2009 IP
  5. Tommyguns

    Tommyguns Peon

    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    I agree with openmindz, but I took it as milllions of competiitors, ie a competitive set of keywords, I think millions of competitors makes that one a given, but i could be wrong.

    what is bare gots connections?

    Ha ha, 'bare gots' is london rudeboy slang (in places), bare = lots gots=im not sure really, but together they mean, depending on context of course, 'alot of jolly good' connections. -)
     
    Tommyguns, Oct 28, 2009 IP
  6. teamnirvana

    teamnirvana Active Member

    Messages:
    844
    Likes Received:
    10
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #6
    Even if we do the SEO for a competitive keyword, that would not be enuff because big players would have already invested millions of dollars through SEOs and established their positions there

    It's not only hard, but it's impossible.
     
    teamnirvana, Oct 28, 2009 IP
  7. Traffic-Bug

    Traffic-Bug Active Member

    Messages:
    1,866
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    80
    #7
    They are just running a seo contest to prmote the techniques of seo and for everyone to learn from each other what techniques were being used to achieve the highest results.
     
    Traffic-Bug, Oct 28, 2009 IP
  8. Tommyguns

    Tommyguns Peon

    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    Huh?.........
     
    Tommyguns, Oct 28, 2009 IP
  9. webcosmo

    webcosmo Notable Member

    Messages:
    5,840
    Likes Received:
    153
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    255
    #9
    lol if he could even get ranked top 10 for one of those kw by 30 days that be great; let alone all of them.
     
    webcosmo, Oct 28, 2009 IP
  10. wayneonweb

    wayneonweb Peon

    Messages:
    131
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    Truely Ridiculous and funny question LOL!
     
    wayneonweb, Oct 28, 2009 IP
  11. newlogo

    newlogo Peon

    Messages:
    3,931
    Likes Received:
    11
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11
    ys its difficult but not impossible task, if u start today u can reach there
     
    newlogo, Oct 28, 2009 IP
  12. imphpguru

    imphpguru Active Member

    Messages:
    439
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    55
    #12
    hey!! it aint ridiculous if you are owner of a site like digg, or google itself probably :D. Anyhow, if one way of achieving the task would be source yourself a PR 7 website on a similar niche, and put up some relevant content on it. Give it some links from some strong PR websites... and I think you should be up there. The costs would be about 5-10K$, but it is achivable i think... Though the stability of rankings is not guaranteed. Google frequently kicks off old content to get fresh content up there :)
     
    imphpguru, Oct 28, 2009 IP
  13. Abhik

    Abhik ..:: The ONE ::..

    Messages:
    11,337
    Likes Received:
    606
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    410
    Digital Goods:
    2
    #13
    Its near impossible to achieve for a new website. But, for a well established site, it can be done by getting lots of high PR relevant sites.
     
    Abhik, Oct 28, 2009 IP
  14. ocenworld

    ocenworld Guest

    Best Answers:
    0
    #14
    absolutely NOT ridiculous....well in internet world....there are all sorts of funny and weird people around.
     
    ocenworld, Oct 28, 2009 IP
  15. COMS

    COMS Guest

    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #15
    I thought it was a ridiculous request as well. I'm curious to know why Ocenworld believes it is not. Are you saying you could do this?

    For the record, this is not something I want to do. Meaning, this isn't a request that I posted. I saw the request posted elsewhere and thought to myself, "Are you kidding?"

    Best,

    Michael
     
    COMS, Oct 29, 2009 IP