Btw, I see many people referring "content" as SEO factor. Content is content. If you don't have it, what's the point with having a web anyway? SEO is SEO, content is not SEO.
Question. Does it matter if it's good content...or just a lot of content? For SEO any content should do...as long as it's unique? But...there will not be any repeat visits with bad content...but that's another issue.
Yes the content must be good.... It is important not to steal content, if you do, your website could get shut down....
One ? I'll say Title tag ... But it's more complicated than that ..... It's like saying, which hand is most important? right or left ? most people will say right hand! But you cant for example clap only with your right hand ................ If you can see what I mean ......
are you having a laugh here? just because he didn't reference the source - he didnt claim it was his. for goodness sake, relax!
whois.domaintools.com has a feature that tells you the relevancy of your page title with the content.
Google claim it's the most important on-page element. I can't give you a source as this was around 6 months ago, but it makes sense.
Hi, Billion I said, the most important factor is the site name, sorry. The site name is the title, not url. The page's title contributes with 7,86% of optimization. The second factor is URL. Google rank a page (or site) with two factors: internal optimization and backlinks. The backlinks is a secundary factor, 'cause we have many sites with pagerank O on first page.