Description Similar to article submission task which you shall do in this project, you will submit the 10 articles to a list of web 2.0 websites like squidoo.com, gather.com etc Some list of Web 2.0 sites. 1) Squidoo.com 2) Quizilla.com 3) Gather.com 4) spongefish.com 5) Wetpaint.com 6) Zimbio.com 7) freewebs.com 8) wikidot.com 9) wikispaces.com 10) Wikia.com 11) flixya.com 12) bluwiki.com 14) eurekster.com 15) flukiest.com 16) xomba.com 17) tumblr.com 18) oondi.com 20) fanpop.com 21) instructables.com 22) wikihow.com Just a tip: You must ensure the formatting especially author bio and the HTML text links of the articles are working in order when you submit to these websites NOTE: Before you submit an article for this task, please make sure that this article has already been submitted and approved in ezinearticles.com Reason being is that those people behind ezinearticles.com are pretty fussy about pen names. Let’s say if you’ve posted an article in web 2.0 sites and then only post that article into ezinearticles.com, the staff at ezinearticles.com will find out about the article posted in web 2.0 sites and may question you the originality of the article and most probably will not approve it. So you must ensure the articles MUST already been APPROVED in ezinearticles before you use that for this web 2.0 submission task. Create the web 2.0 website URL according to a specified keyword whenever possible ie instead of http://www.freewebs.com/username/index.htm you will crease http://www.freewebs.com/{KEYWORD}/index.htm.
There is no such thing as a Web 2.0 Web site. http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html That being said, you're still duplicating your content - which you never want to do.
Stating that there is no such thing as a web 2.0 site just because it was mentioned on a site is somewhat ridiculous. If you will look at the Wikipedia of "Web 2.0", you will see that the term "Web 2.0 Site" is referenced many times. I believe that the original post here is extremely useful and just needs a little more explanation. Of course you do not want to duplicate your content; however, if you "spin" your content then you can take one post or article and use it many times without duplicating your content.
And since when has Wikipedia been cited as a credible resource? Tim O'Reilly coined the term "Web 2.0" and he never intended it to be about Web design or style. It was meant to be used as a catch-phrase for Web applications (note I said applications, not sites) sharing meta-data and extracting meaning from it. The "design concepts" are really architectural in nature rather than visual or content driven. To paraphrase Weird Al Yankovic... "It's all about the meta-data, baby!"
I can't see anything wrong with it.... why don't i never want to duplicate my content? then maybe I'll prove you wrong
You NEVER want to use your own site's content in an article or press release. It's just bad practice. The article is supposed to drive someone to your site, not just tell them the same stuff twice. BTW, Matt Cuts said that the whole "duplicate content" penalty is more of a myth. There are penalties, but not on a small amount of similar pages. Web 2.0 is one of those phrases that needs to die.. I HATE THAT PHRASE!!!!