And even if he were????? I don't get the his point... A person decended of slaves could very well become president in the future. It is conceiveable that in the (distant) future a muslim could even become prez but..... Islamic influence in western europe and NA will be insignificant. It simply is too late. Modern western society will not allow itself to be driven back into the dark ages. There are several storms brewing in western europe (Switzerland, France, Italy,Netherland) that will gain strength and make living there as a (devout) muslim undesirable/restrictive. If you don't know what I am talking about look up the proposed/imposed laws in these nations for religion (mainly Islam) and immigration.
His step-father was from Indonnesia AND he was a MUSLIM Be afraid, be very afraid... Islam is taking over the US when...
I am not afraid of anything. Ä°t is hard for Muslims to integrate in Europe now. In Germany do you know what questions were asked to a student ( Muslim) Q- Do you know how to make a bomb Q- Did you take a place in any terror Q- Are member of any other terror organisations etc. Do such questions help to integrate with European sociaty ? Do such questions help Muslims students to be educated well in Europe nowadays ? But I hope in future, there would be changes in minds
Immigrants in Europe ( Muslim immigrants ), could achieve differents position in Europe. As you told in the future a muslim could even become a prez too . That was I tryed to say
As the Jews were slaves for the Egyptian, and now are able to control US to serve its illegal country and defend its war crimes. You are right.
You forget about the war the jews wage in afghanistan & iraq and their network of organ harvesting and trading associations
Jews are not controlling the US. US citizens are controlling the US and they may be jews, alcoholics, females, football fans, etc...it's not the same thing...
Oh, nowhere...I said so because it's a fashion there... So how are you guys going to kill the French then?
No... It is merely a preservation of ones own culture. Minarets do not belong amongts the architecture of ancient Europe. I see no problem with them in amongst the modern architecture however. In Canada, the province of Quebec was created mostly by french decendants. They have tried, on several occasion, to seperate from Canada but have failed to obtain majority support. They did however manage to install (seemiling restrictive) laws that ban english language signs and/or non-french culture. If you travel older part of this province you would see why. Mosques, temples and anything that distracts from the old french culture has no place here. This is their history and it should be preserved. Same goes for much of Europe. Build your mosques, temples, etc but only within the design and specification dictated by those who came before.
Why would anyone be afraid of a building? I am no more afraid of Minarets of Mosque than I am of a toothbrush or a hat. Those are inanimate objects. I am afraid for anyone who has to live under Islamic law. I would fight to make sure such laws were never applied in my country. At the same time I welcome Muslims to pray and practice their religion - so long as they keep it to themselves and do not try to impose their beliefs on anyone else.
Dear Religious People Intent Upon Taking Over The World: I will beat you to it, you poor pitiful (and I mean I pity you) masses. Sincerely, Jackuul
The Islamic world is not welcoming Christianity either. In Turkey a few Christian missionaries were killed a few years ago. In many muslim countries it is against the law for a non muslim to take a high ranking government post.
Why did I ask about Minarets , because , in Switzerland, tryed to ban Minarets, as I know, there was held voting for Minarets, and they canceled banning Minarets
There are muslims were killed in US and other non-muslim countries while they were going to prayer few monthes ago. (they were not preaching any one.) I. K. A/J. C. U Maybe there is also the other side as well. There are non-muslims who reach a high ranking government post, but they should be of he same nationality as the country they are part of.
Don't worry we not going to kill them : 1- As native americans had been killed 2- As Japons had been killed with nuclear power 3- As Kids ,women, civils had been killed by ITF ( israel terrorist forces) 4- As civils had been killed in Iraq 5- As civils had been killed in Afghanistan 7- As ppls had been killed in Vietnam war 8- As Algerians had been killed by France 9- As Paris massacre of 1961
This link http://academic.evergreen.edu/g/grossmaz/interventions.html says it all the U.S. always attacked violence by its opponents as "terrorism," "atrocities against civilians," or "ethnic cleansing," but minimized or defended the same actions by the U.S. or its allies. If a country has the right to "end" a state that trains or harbors terrorists, would Cuba or Nicaragua have had the right to launch defensive bombing raids on U.S. targets to take out exile terrorists? Washington's double standard maintains that an U.S. ally's action by definition "defensive," but that an enemy's retaliation is by definition "offensive." although nearly all the post-World War II interventions were carried out in the name of "freedom" and "democracy," nearly all of them in fact defended dictatorships controlled by pro-U.S. elites. Whether in Vietnam, Central America, or the Persian Gulf, the U.S. was not defending "freedom" but an ideological agenda (such as defending capitalism) or an economic agenda (such as protecting oil company investments). and than they come and give us lectures of humanity.. what a joke!
Killing has been, is and always will be between humans race. That's not the point. If you are not going to kill them, you are not following the qu'ran. So I guess you are not a muslim. Therefore you are not believing in Allah, making you an infidel... That's all I wanted to know...