The only distinction to that matters to new is the person's religion, if he is Muslim he can do anything and new will justify it, if he is non-Muslim even if he is doing noble acts new will condemn him. It is sad to see such a twisted mind at work. That is why he sees acid throwing Muslim Taliban as good and Western Armies trying to stop them as bad. He has a simpleton outlook on the world: Muslim good, everyone else bad.
This is the thing brown, no actions can be too horrific for the muslims on this form to defend so long as it was committed by a muslim. we have had them defending everything from child rape to executions of women in front of hundreds of spectators for the crime of not knowing their place. Now we have them defending the act of disfiguring a child with acid. And they wonder why people have a problem with them and their mindset. If only they could see what barbarians this so called religion turns people in to. whether it's the people committing the acts or those defending them it seems from all of it's followers islam takes a very important part of being human from them.
western armies have brought more death and destruction to women and kids of Afghanistan than the Taliban Is the logic to kill 100 to save 1 sane ? moreover, Afghanistan is for afghani people not for americans, so it the Afghan's who decide what rules and law they make and follow not the americans? or do you think that every country should 1st take approval from US for its laws? btw I condemn acid throwing, if there was any, however any punishments given in accordance with Sharia are perfectly OK for me you must know the famous line war for peace is like f*king for virginity war for saving lives is also like f*king for virginity I suggest that you too take off this disguise and accept that west attacked Afghanistan for its own vested interest in the region, not for the love of kids and women (who anyway were doing way better with talis than they are doing now) The humanity thing might be a good fodder for the fox generation but is far from reality and is only a failed attempt to justify an illegitimate occupation of country just as the attack on iraq was bs, so is the attack on Afghanistan all done to serve the neocons and their global agendas
Hey... new.. have you seen this movie yet? its a must! http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3791007322683758535
Muslims always bring this up. I guess when you are on the losing side you have to try to make the most of it. new, I wish these thing were 10000 to 0. I don't care how many of the bad guys die. So then your opinion on this is as worthless as mine. Luckily, my country is doing what I want. What is your country doing about Afganistan? Nah, as long as they don't oppress their own people (that includes women!), then they are fair game. How big of you. And I see, never miss a chance to show your willingness to overlook the obvious just so you can support someone who claims to be Muslims. It is really interesting to watch you operate. And this is why I think you and your religion (because you are telling that is where the rules come from) is barbaric. How Islamic of you. Mohammad and I both understand that there are necessary wars. It is a shame you do not understand such a simple concept. I know that my country was attacking by Islamic terrorist from Afghanistan. For that, they have not yet begun to pay the price, so I don't really give a shit about your complaints. hey are the enemy of my country and I have no sympathy for them. I do sympathize with the innocent civilians and hope they chose the right path. The reality is that my country has all the money and the power, it just so happens that we are also on the side of morality and freedom as well. I don't think we have much to worry about from your Islamic terrorist buddies. I know I will never live under Sharia. Hopefully Muslims will stop terrorizing people intro following their laws.
It is not me YOU have claimed that you are in afghanistan to save their women so I was just wondering if you were really doing them any favor? My country is no in afgahnistan, forcing them to follow my ideology and make the laws that I want very funny indeed OK, fine But than stop claiming that US attacked Afghans for humanity and to save their women Yes, You have the power and money But sorry, this is not for morality and freedom, it for your own political gains huh ? who is forcing ? Its you and your allies who want to force your own laws at Afghan people
Taliban were trying to follow the Sharia law, no matter how bad it was or how bad was their implementation of the law, It was their choice folks here are saying that US invaded because the laws were too oppressive (which itself is wrong, since US attacked for political gains, neocon aggenda) In other words, it US who choses what is a good law and what is bad, what can be followed what should not be followed Now US have a puppet their in form of karzaai who licks the masters boots and does as he is ordered
Oh, ok. The way you worded it, I mistakenly took it as you were saying we were pushing our laws as new laws on them. I appreciate you clearing up that what you meant was we're removing laws that we feel are oppressive (or so we claim) in an attempt to give the Afghan people what we see as freedom and equal rights whether we're right or wrong. And aside from that your personal opinion is that it's been done for "political gains" and a "neocon aggenda". I'm totally caught up and understand now, I think.
Yes. They are indigenous of the land, but they are not the only indigenous people of Afghanistan who deserve to participate in ruling the land. The taliban is predominantly Pashtun. The Pashtuns is an ethnic group which consist only 40% of the afghan population. In practice, if you are not Pashtun [ for example Tajik (37%) or Hazara (10%) or Uzbek (10%) ] you have no saying in afghanistan, because the Taliban is not just an extremist religious organization, but also a racist organization: Not just the rule of the sharia, but also the rule of the Pashtuns. 40% ruling the rest is not that bad, when looking at the Muslim world, in Jordan the Bedouin Arab minority (25%-35%) rule the Palestinian majority, and in Syria the Alawi minority (~8%) rules the majority. By "Ruling" I mean that if your ethnicity is not the "right one", you have no chance to get an office. And these guys from above like to call Israel a "racist apartheid country".... the middle east is funny, isn't it?
If all these Muslim countries are so great why are the occupants all trying to get out? If the UK opened a space station on Mars, before long you would have Muslims hiding in the hold trying to live there.
@Choas It does not suit you to talk about 'racism' and even if we take what you are saying is right taliban =40% NATO/US = how much % do they represent ? and have US/NATO given the 40% the liberty to chose how they want to live? all they want is to force their own ways on whole Afghanistan
Nope, remember when the Islamic terrorists attacking the United States led from their bases in Afghanistan? That is why were are there. It is almost the 8 year anniversary of the Islamic terrorist attack on America. The happy side effect of our actions in Afghanistan are restoring freedom and stopping the oppression of women in the name of Islam. By the way, I have a simple question for you. Do you condemn the 9-11 attack without reservation? (My guess, based on your posts here, is that you supported the attacks and sympathize with the attackers not the victims) Let me know if I am right.
*chuckle* I forgot you are incapable of calling an Islamic terrorist for what he is. On Friday, September 11, I will be thinking of the Islamic terrorists who attacked my country and people like you ThraXed who sympathize with them and their thinking eight years later.