Good alternative for HotFile ?

Discussion in 'Affiliate Programs' started by bluearrow, Aug 11, 2009.

  1. aint.it.johnny

    aint.it.johnny Peon

    Messages:
    191
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #21
    Call me nuts but as far as I know GeekStorage.com is a the kinda company you host your domain, webpages etc. the have nothing to do with the oneclickfilehoster your looking for.
    bluearrowit really depends on the stuff you're planning to upload. Like e.g. porn, ebooks.....
    and the filesize.
    But sadly it's a fact that there a hardly any firms out there that pay reasonal cash for ~1MB files.
    It looks like it boils down to having a mixed calculation of different filesizes. But than again is it worth the hassel of uploading small files in the first place.
     
    aint.it.johnny, Aug 15, 2009 IP
  2. george101

    george101 Member

    Messages:
    191
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    #22
    storage.to is a very good alternative if u r onto big files (> 90Mb)
     
    george101, Aug 15, 2009 IP
  3. bluearrow

    bluearrow Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,339
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    130
    #23
    Yeah That site is a hosting site ... :( Well I have few sites about e-books and about photos (Manga, models, wildlife). I'm getting a decent traffic so ... I know its pretty hard to deal with smaller file size.
     
    bluearrow, Aug 16, 2009 IP
  4. aint.it.johnny

    aint.it.johnny Peon

    Messages:
    191
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #24
    Well maybe u should give upload.to a shoot..
    upload.to gives u points for files bigger 50KB but lemme tell u this u don't accualy earn for the dl but for the ad layer they show. THe layer has to be open a specific time and bla bla (take a look at the terms). Plus the company has there server located in germany and just apostbox in switzerland ;-). The think that sux the most is that uploaded.to reduces ur revenus the amount of the german TAX which is like 20% :-(.Evene the fact that there paying up to 10 EUROS per 1000 layer views can't make up for a 20% cut in the end.
     
    aint.it.johnny, Aug 16, 2009 IP
  5. bluearrow

    bluearrow Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,339
    Likes Received:
    8
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    130
    #25
    upload.to doesn't seems to be much promising, does it ?
     
    bluearrow, Aug 18, 2009 IP
  6. bigbossman

    bigbossman Peon

    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #26
    yea i'd stay away from upload.to,storage.to on the other hand is pretty good.:)
     
    bigbossman, Aug 18, 2009 IP
  7. theapparatus

    theapparatus Peon

    Messages:
    2,925
    Likes Received:
    119
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #27
    I asked this in another thread but never got a real answer. DO these hosts have the "one download per ip address per day" restriction some of these file hosts have like megaupload? Have like 51k downloads with them but credit for only 15k.
     
    theapparatus, Aug 18, 2009 IP
  8. aint.it.johnny

    aint.it.johnny Peon

    Messages:
    191
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #28
    :D my bad it's uploaded.to
    Well with DF and sharingmatrix it's the among the few hoster that bother to pay for uploads in the 1MB range.
     
    aint.it.johnny, Aug 18, 2009 IP
  9. aint.it.johnny

    aint.it.johnny Peon

    Messages:
    191
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #29
    DF, sharingmatrix.com one count per IP a day
    uploaded.to u get points but cash for the layer will only grated every 3 hours per ip
    hotfile pays for every freeloader
    storage.to pays for multiple as far as I know
    bitroad.net changes it's reward prog too often to keep track ;-)
    uploading.com allegedly pays for multiple download
    RS counts multiple dls but as far as I know the have an up to passage somewhere
    But as a rule of thumb most of the hosts pay per ip and only a few pay multiple dls.


    Cherio
     
    aint.it.johnny, Aug 18, 2009 IP
    theapparatus likes this.
  10. george101

    george101 Member

    Messages:
    191
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    #30
    Hotfile and Storage are the best now
     
    george101, Aug 18, 2009 IP
  11. theapparatus

    theapparatus Peon

    Messages:
    2,925
    Likes Received:
    119
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #31
    Thanks for the response. hotfile got back to me and confirmed that they "pay" for each download although it's a 15 minute wait between downloads.

     
    theapparatus, Aug 19, 2009 IP
  12. wyvern2

    wyvern2 Active Member

    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    86
    #32
    I think ugotfile more better
     
    wyvern2, Sep 18, 2009 IP
  13. theapparatus

    theapparatus Peon

    Messages:
    2,925
    Likes Received:
    119
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #33
    Same as before:

    http://ugotfile.com/cookie

    All those wasted downloads...
     
    theapparatus, Sep 18, 2009 IP
  14. P.P.

    P.P. Peon Affiliate Manager

    Messages:
    138
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #34
    Try easy-share. There is a new revenue share program with good payouts.
     
    P.P., Sep 18, 2009 IP
  15. george101

    george101 Member

    Messages:
    191
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    #35
    hot-file is way better than easy-share, even storage.to is better than easy-share!!!

    am also looking for an alternative, but till now hf gives the highest conversion
     
    george101, Sep 19, 2009 IP
  16. bigbossman

    bigbossman Peon

    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #36
    But their ranking system sucks,i have stayed at copper for 2 months lol
     
    bigbossman, Sep 19, 2009 IP
  17. theapparatus

    theapparatus Peon

    Messages:
    2,925
    Likes Received:
    119
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #37
    A very quick read through of their FAQ doesn't show any mention of an IP address restriction outside of the normal country restrictions.

    It does appear though that you have to push the premium accounts though and you don't get the ability to get paid unless you do. (See the bit about traffic quality, which you have to score above 50 out of a 100.) Also once you push those accounts, those premium downloaders don't give you any credits for their downloading. Sounds like a catch 22 to me.
     
    theapparatus, Sep 19, 2009 IP
  18. george101

    george101 Member

    Messages:
    191
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    30
    #38
    lol... am at gold most of the times and sometimes even platinum. may be u r uploading way too much and the downloads/premium sales u get are low
     
    george101, Sep 19, 2009 IP
  19. Slumber

    Slumber Peon

    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #39
    I am also stuck with copper for 2 weeks but my daily earning is not very bad, i can get average 5usd daily. :)

    Try Uploading.com, they provide highest rate in the market file hosting services. Now my status on there is Power which it pays 15usd/ 1000 downloads for file larger than 250mb. Recommended!
     
    Last edited: Oct 1, 2009
    Slumber, Oct 1, 2009 IP
  20. ramlisamsam

    ramlisamsam Peon

    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #40
    hotfile is the best. never failed pay me.
    [​IMG]

    but i'm looking filehost better or par with hotfile. uploading too slow i'm just registered for a week. only got
    [​IMG] :( .
     
    ramlisamsam, Oct 6, 2009 IP