Title: Harry Potter 6 Genre: Adventure/Drama/Fantasy/Mystery Directed by: David Yates Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, Michael Gambon Release Date: Wed 15, Jul 2009 Plot: Voldemort is tightening his grip on both the Muggle and wizarding worlds and Hogwarts is no longer the safe haven it once was. Harry suspects that dangers may even lie within the castle, but Dumbledore is more intent upon preparing him for the final battle that he knows is fast approaching...
And the cast is: Daniel Radcliffe as Harry Potter , Emma Watson as Hermione Granger , Rupert Grint as Ron Weasley , Michael Gambon as Albus Dumbledore , Alan Rickman as Severus Snape , Helena Bonham Carter as Bellatrix Lestrange , Jim Broadbent as Horace Slughorn , Robbie Coltrane as Rubeus Hagrid , Timothy Spall as Peter Pettigrew , David Thewlis as Remus Lupin , Maggie Smith as Minerva McGonagall , Julie Walters as Molly Weasley , Mark Williams as Arthur Weasley , Tom Felton as Draco Malfoy , Evanna Lynch as Luna Lovegood
I'm not much of a Harry Potter Fan - I watched only d 1st 2 or so - but the creativity of the writer is just incredible. Goes a long way to show how powerful the human mind can be if we really put it to the tests. A captivating story like hers only show up once in a very long time...
7th book boring?? Pah, I think that was the most 'mature' book of the lot. All the others are like enid blyton..all hairy-fairy stuff It's only the 7th book that has emotion,adventure,tragedy & deaths(lots of them ) and suspense. Why don't you like it?
This is the 2nd thread on this today :/ Still, looks like it's going to be a great film, I'll be seeing it on Saturday
I didn't say it was boring. But I certainly did not feel it was realistic. Yes there were deaths, but the ending of the story looked forced. JKR remembered that her core audience were still kids, and probably wrote her ending keeping them in mind. The primary antagonist, Voldemort, is regarded as one of the most brilliant students to have set foot in Hogwarts. Why does he then keep on making the same mistakes again and again? There were other ways to kill Harry, and after seeing his killing curse fail twice ( once when he was born, and the other in the Forest), I see no reason for a clever Voldemort to mindlessly use the AK a third time. And Harry using Expelliarmus in the end? And winning just because Voldemort's curse rebounded towards him? I'm sorry, but that was not my idea of a good book at all. I personally liked the fourth book a lot, followed by the second book. The rest are more or less at the same level.
Mate, that's because Harry was the owner of the Death Wand; that's why the curse failed, that's why it rebounded on He Who Must Not Be Named.
I have a feeling we're going to be having a lot of screaming kids in the theaters for this movie and however they split up the 7th book.
If He Who Must Not be Named was someone called He Who Had Some Sense, he wouldn't have used the killing curse. A cutting curse to the neck, or some other curse would have served the purpose too.
oh wow maybe i should create a new thread everytime there's a new movie coming out and just copy and paste plot, cast etc....that's a good way to spam
You are right. Infact Harry and Ginny do nothing serious- except for a kiss or two in Book 6 and Book 7.
Depends on what you define as "snogging" of course. Also for we all know, JK may have a dirty mind and her editors just removed the steamer parts. Maybe we'll see Harry Potter and the Love Tower some day.