United States Vs Russia Who would win? (Nobody can use nukes) NATO and Warsaw Pact didn't exist either only United States and Russia War Was being fought in Russia But both countries had all their weapons there so it was a fair battle Personally I believe it would be damn close But U.S. Would win. Of course someone would have to surrender. The United States has more troops and more military technology then Russia does as well as more experience. However Russia does have more tanks then the United States (If it were a Ground war)
What would determine victory... Elimination of troops? Elimination of Troops and Civilians? Would we have to be able to hold an occupation without an insurgency to be considered the victors? If Combat operations were all that were required and the war were to be fought in the summer season, we would annihilate them. If we were required to occupy, we wouldnt get half way across the country.
Have more tanks is one, get them to work( move, and fire) is a other..It will be damn shame if one these won't fired on the enemy.
US would win very quickly I think. Tanks doesn't mean sh!t, this isn't 1914 or 1944. Whoever has the best technology wins, it would probably be fought like a chess match, more planning and getting into position than actually fighting on ground.
Logistically, Russia, by itself and through its cronies, could definitely put up a fight by cutting off the supply of oil. If the war lasted longer than a year, Russia. Shorter, the US.
In a 'neutral' battlefield: Very easy win for USA. It is called a professional army as opposed to their conscript based service. Russia are only considered powerful because of their nukes. But in a straight fight on conventional terms their poor equipment will let them down badly. Poor as in outdated by NATO and USA standards. At present even ourselves (UK) and France could take them in a conventional war on neutral turf. On Russian turf they (Russia) would probably win, but only because of the obvious reasons.
Russia would succesfully defended themselfs. Their army is adopted to fight defending wars not conquering. In the first month US would lose so much AIR power that they should stop all attacking tasks, and starting to consider what to do if Russian do large scale counter attack. Also such a war would cause all Russian people to stand up and raise against aggressor. If war is on neutral terrain. US would win.
No one of the sides. It would be the end for both countries and possible for all other ones too. Really, i don't understand why people create topics like this.
Well, yes true, americans have great war technology, but you cant forget that russians arent that far behind, in fact, they have some thing better than USA. the only thing is, russia has alot more land area to cover and a lot less people. Than, russia has many underground missile sites, etc... But, i think the USA would win if they tried.
maybe america wins but after war im sure america wouldnt be old america as economical etc. so us will not do this. bombing russia is not really like bombing iraq or afghanistan which we cant even say has an ordinary troop against slings.
You obviously know nothing of the US Air Force. There is technology that has not been released to the public that is in effect already. Technologically advanced aircraft that can beat the Air Defense of Russia without so much as triggering an alarm.