Just got back from work, and, after a very quick look at the thread, I'm happy/amazed at the quality and quantity of entries. I'm just about to have my dinner, so after, I'll have a look in more detail and post some feedback. Keep those entries coming though please!
Thanks again for all entries so far. My initial findings and feedback in post order: Hanan - Not really what I'm looking for, sorry. Icey011 - Again, Not really what I'm looking for, sorry. efragoso - Simple, which isn't necessarily a bad thing, but I'm afraid I don't like the graphic on the submitted logo, sorry. Katesrobyn - Nice first attempt, but th colours, although similar, are not quite fitting with the site. I'm also unsure about the font, sorry. jnjnnino - Nice attempts. I prefer the second post's logo, although I'm unsure about using the PC's for the graphic? otakatun - Again, nice attempt, but the colours again, although similar, do not quite fit with the sites pastel looking colours. I'm also unsure what the upside down smiley face graphic represents? RaduTRIFAN - Nice first attempt. Simple and to the point. I see the 'Well' doesn't quite fit i the circle however. Also, I think a separate logo before the text might be better so I can use it for a favicon/branding etc. maybe some variations? TheAge - Again, nice first attempt. Although the first 3 lgo's look ok, I'm unsure how they would look on top of the website, and I don't think they would fit it. Original looking though, and I like the fact that the graphical part could be used as a favicon/branding. Any variations? Showing the logo on top of the website would also be helpful for me... weblazer - Wrong wording and a little generic looking, sorry. nosfis - Wrong spelling, and not really what I'm looking for, sorry. ^_^DesignGuru - Although I can see what you have done with the graphical element of the logo (quite clever), I don't think it really works. Also, I'm afraid I don't like the font choice, sorry. I can see you're a capable designer though, so feel free to try again! ploomer - I like it. Nice first attempt. Again, I like the fact that the graphical part could be used as a favicon/branding. Any variations on the theme? Also, could I see it on top of the website to see how it 'fits in'? Neoni - The red parts/colours of the site will probably be changing (sorry, should have said), therefore the red coulour of the logo won't be appropriate, sorry. Also, it's a little generic looking... icey011 - Not really what I'm looking for, sorry. Jokomamamita - Nice simple looking design, and good first attempt.I'm unsure about the globe graphic however. Variations on the theme please? nosfis - Not really what I'm looking for, sorry. I hope the feedback helps everybody. Feel free to post/PM any other questions I can help with. Whilst looking through the logo's, I think having a graphic then the wording might be better (like most of you have done) as I see the graphical element being used as a favicon, or perhaps as 'branding' on its own. Also having the 'well' and 'hosted' words in different colours seems to work better than ' well hosted' all in one colour. Saying that, remember that you are the designer, and if you think you can change my mend, feel free to submit what you think might be the winner! Thanks all so far, and keep them coming!
Thanks for the feedback Tommy T, actually its a combine of 'W and H'...but it now look like a bad one
thanks for your feedback... here's a revision.. making it simple and crisp.. feedback is very much appreciated.
Hi Thanks for your feedback, we made 3 variants of your logo, hope you like it: Thanks, RT Design Studio
Hi! I'm glad you like my logo and my branding ideas. When you choose a logo you actually chose your brand style. here are the variations you asked.
Thanks for your feedback. Here is my revised entry. As you can see, the logo is a complex combination of the alphabet W and H and it can even be used for branding purpose and favicon as well. =)
Hi again, Thank you for entries/revisions. Again, here's feedback which I hope helps everybody. If you need more information, or you are unsure of my thoughts, feel free to post or PM. CHSajid - Thanks for the logo. Although I can see that the logo has been professionally made/designed, the swirly graphic is not really what I'm looking for, sorry otakatun - Hi again. Great idea with the graphic part of the logo. The W and H are clearly visible, however, I don't like the spheres circling the graphic (too generic looking). Also, the text doesn't really fit I feel. I think it's the wrong font (something beefier like jokomamamita's I like), and the colours, again, don't really fit with the pastel blues and greys of the site. If you could polish the graphic and text and post some variations? katesrobyn - Good to see a different approach, but I feel it's not really what I'm looking for, sorry. Again, I think I like the beefier fonts like jokomamamita's better. logorice - Thanks for the entry. Nice first attempt. Again, I like the fresh approach of the graphic. Although I can see the W and H in the graphic part of the logo, could this be made slightly more clearer at all? Also, I think I prefer the text on one line with a beefier font. Some variations on the theme would be great. nosfis - Thanks for the logo's. I'm afraid they remind me to much of the temporary logo that is on the site however, sorry. Aderain - Thanks for the entry. I think the logo and font used are a bit thin looking, and not really in keeping with the site, sorry. jnjnnino - Thanks for the revisions. I'm afraid I'm still unsure about the computers in the graphic, sorry (I deliberately didn't go for computer/server pictures on the website, as many hosting sites do). ^_^DesignGuru - Hi again. Thanks for the revisions, and for showing favicon, nice. Although I like it more than the last concept, and I can see how the W and H are represented in the graphic part of the logo, I don't think the H comes through very clear. Also, I'm not sure the font goes with the site? Making the colours of the logo more pastel like I think would make the logo gel better. raduTRIFAN - Thanks for the revisions. Although I like them, as I mentioned previously, I think a graphic and then the wording would help me, as I'm hoping to use the graphic for branding/favicon etc. Also making the colours more pastel like to keep in with the website I feel. ploomer - Thanks for the revisions. I'm unsure of which colour I like best now! I like the simplicity of the graphic, and how it looks on top of the web site, and the thin line between the graphic and the text (your last picture in your post). In fact, I'm worried that it might be too simplistic compared to the other entries, but feel that, at the moment, I should go with my initial feeling. My only suggestion is to see if you can polish the logo at all. Maybe trying different fonts/shading to really finish it off? I'll leave the polishing up to you though DrDesigner - Thanks for the entry. I like the new concept, but I'm worried that the H gets lost slightly, and the graphic is slightly too 'blocky'? Also, I think a different/larger font would be nice... jokomamamita - Thanks for the revision. Out of all of the logos, initially, I liked your text/font the most. Having the tag line underneath is also a new twist, but as I don't have a tag line (and wouldn't use that one), I'm unsure it would work. Maybe if I had a decent tagline... Also, I'm afraid I don't like the graphic part of the logo, sorry. Although I can see what you have done with the W and H, I think it's quite hard to see, and looks a little generic. nosfis - Again, thanks for the entry. I'm sorry though but, although the concept is sound, I don't think the colours/finish really matches the site, sorry. I really hope the feedback helps everybody. I didn't think/know that analyzing and posting feedback would be so hard and time consuming! My findings from the entries so far: - keeping the colours (blues/greys) pastel like in keeping with the site colours rather that just any blue and black seems the way to go. - I think having a graphic and then the text seems the way forward also, as I'm hoping to use the graphic on its own for future branding, and perhaps a favicon etc. Ploomer's idea of having the graphic and text separated by a fine line looks cool too I think (here) - I think the font used is also a big deal. I like the chunkier font used by jokomamamita, and I think it fits in with the site better. You being the designers though, feel free to prove me wrong... The bottom line is that I want the logo to look as if the website was designed around the logo. Not that the logo was an afterthought and stuck on afterwards. That is why I think getting the pastel like blues, greys and blacks are so important. Also, why I wanted to see the logo with the website if possible. That way, I can see if the logo looks part of the site, not an afterthought. Thank you again to everybody, and please keep those entries/revisions coming!