Poll:At what point should abortions be legal?

the first 3 months before the child has a sex (gender, genitalia, ya know)

 

LOL, just doing my job, bringing people round to the right way of thinking

No, I still don't see the joke, maybe is Scandavian 'humour'? I guess it doesn't travel well.

I'm not comparing their task, I'm comparing their legitimacy. You're saying it's legitmate for a guard to kill a human but not legitimate for a doctor, while at the same time saying humans shouldn't kill another human? Doesn't seem to add up to me.

Do you actually know anything about nuclear weapons? Who do you think will drill the oil in an area reduced to a nuclear wasteland? You guys seem to have lots of ideas which are great, but when you apply them to reality you're made to look a little stupid.

 

Honestly, that only makes you look like a moron.

It wasn't really a joke, it was more like a stupid question for a stupid question.

I think the doctors task is to protect lifes. Not killing innocent citizens.
The guards task is to guard prisoners, make sure they follow their orders and that they don't escape or use some destructive behaviour. The prisoners are basically assholes and I don't feel that it's a loss if they get death penalty for killing someone in the real world. They have allready had their chance. Although, from an economic perspective, they can be used for generate wealth, read my last answer in this post.

First of all, I just suggested that many had this opinion about ME. Also said that I didn't share it.

But ofcource, no human beeing with more than a half braincell want's to work there. But US could probably make a good use of the terrorist prisoners on Guantanamo

 

Check out this video

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5207159640493874061&q=kent+hovind

Deebunked that means you

 

I love it when people start to lose an arguemnet and have to resort to personal instults. I feel sorry as it just shows a lack of intelligence

Oh, I get it now - hilarious

So when you said a human shouldn't kill another human that was a lie? Or are you just mixed up?

Oh, sorry, just the guys you hang around with then. Sorry I didn't realise you could forum your own opinions.

That's no way to talk about all those brave US servicemen

 

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAH!!!! OMFG... I really can't believe there's people who believe in this crap?

 

Yep, I watched about 30 mins of it. He claims that fossils of dinosaurs aren't evidence that they existed - huh? He also seems to used sarcasm every few minutes to get some cheap laughs from the small audience. I also read the comments, apparently he was done for tax evasion.

He said abortions are always murder. How does he figure that when 'murder' means to 'kill another human being'. How many people would agree that a freshly fertilised egg is a 'human being'? Not many.

 

What is it? I'm eating right now, so I'm not going to check it out. Something about young angry white males with low IQs and molten steel?

 

Sounds like Bush's wet dream

 

What argument?

When did I say "a human shouldn't kill another human"? Are you suggesting that rights should be implemented to guilty prisoners accused for terrorism

Actually I think my opinion is more own to me than your BBC-inserted opinion is to you

Huh? 0101100101? Explain please..

 

Erm, the debate we're having now?

No, I support capital punisment, I'm just pointing out the absurdity of your standpoint when you claim it's right and just to kill in one situation and not in another. Do you like making life and death decisions, does it make you feel big and important?

As I said before I form my own opinions based on what I feel is correct and just. I don't agree with most of the things the BBC says or a lot of political paries for that matter. I'm unlike some other people around here that are too imature to form their own opinions and just thinks what they're told to think

I'm just saying I think it's a bit mean to judge the US army as having half a braincell just because they're working out in the gulf.

 

Are you discussing the outcomming result from this thread? We're not finnished

I'm just saying that I don't care for guilty terrorists 'rights'. I do care for the unborned rights because..

It's not any significant difference between a borned and a newly borned baby but the right to live. Somewhere we need to draw the line. Since there's etc no significant difference between a 3month old foteus and a 2months/30 days old foteus, we need to draw the line between life and not life were we see a clear significant development at once. I can't see it anywhere else than the Conception. It's also an innocent human beeing.

Well than that's great! Good luck to you!

Ahh.. no I meant the drilling job after the nukes are exploaded. Sorry if I didn't make myself clear.

 

Well I don't see much new coming from you

Nor do I. I just can't see any logic in your view that it's okay to kill sometimes and not others. Are you god?

Right, so who is going to do the job, or are we going to go back to riding around in horse and carts or log fires instead of central heating?

 

Haha.. you're the one that repeat stuffs

I believe that you have a chance to live a good life. If you missuse it by trying to screw others then I don't think the rights of such person are as important as they was before, the society must be able to protect itself for such people and everyone must also be able to protect themselfs, especially prison guards at a millitary prison filled with terrorist assholes. God or not, I will still have my own opinion just like you.

Prisoners. They can get equiqment and a 3-6 months effective education. Then they could at least return something for the society.

 

LOL, you're seriously suggesting sending prisoners to a certain death from radiation poisoning? I'm not sure if this is even funny. Hitler certainly had nothing on you.

 

Never said I support a policy in sending out prisoners to nuclear zones. Don't have much against it tough(if they get properly nuclear protection tools). The point was to show the possibillities for you.

And again, I am not supporting the idea to nuke the whole middle east. I just pointed out that many people think in these lines.

If you want to argue about this issue, I suggest you to start a poll or something.

 

LOL, I actually think you've got some kind of split personality disorder, do you even remember what you've written in previous posts. I think you were the one that brought up the ideas of nuking the middle east and sending prisoners to an area contaminated by radiation.

"Never argue with an idiot, they'll drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience"

 

I just stated that many people have that opinion, not have I ever said that this opinion was my own. Sometimes I wonder were you get all your BS from

 

LOL, perhaps next time you complain about arguing a point you should remember who brought it up in the first place

 

The first thing I said about this idea was that I was against it. What do you want to argue about? Perhaps I could ask you why you think that North Korea isn't a threat