If you put any household chemical together correctly it could be deadly.. and could potentially have a large impact! Granny has a can of lysol! WMD! RUN!!!
No, not really. I actually have never killed anyone, how many Jews have you lynched? And honestly, the way I see it, Muslims want to see us die. They dance in the streets after 9/11, they pass out candy after Israel PM goes into a coma. Far as I can tell, they're a bunch of wild animals that need to be tamed. It appears Israel is playing the part of the dog trainer. Are there good people in Iraq, Iran, Palestine, etc? Of course, no doubt about it. But the ratio of good people to bad people is to close. The entire middle east needs to be dealt with. The Jews are dealing with it. I don't feel sorry for people who blow themselves up and kill others for no reason. Who started this whole thing? That's right, the palestinians did by kidnapping the Jewish soldier. Now they can either give the soldier back, or face the punishment. Personally, I hope it's the latter of the two. You are a stupid little man and have no right to be in the United States. The FBI should definitely be watching you, you are up to no good, DOUCHE BAG.
Haven't lynched anyone, I think that was your family doing the lynching back in the slave days...still got your white ghost costume? Bwahahahahaha!!!! They should deff. be watching a non-religious internet entrepenuer who could care less about the majority of this country! Hopefully they're capable of watching me better than the guys they built the bomb for in 1993, maybe they can get the depart of homeland security to watch my bank accounts and listen to my boring phone calls too... no better way to spend taxpayer dollars...
I don't believe he ever said Saddam was planning an attack (maybe implying a danger), but if you have the quote that directly asserts such, please post it. Many governments had the same intelligience and both sides asserted him as a threat (many believing he had weapons), true or not...do you consider all those people liars, too? non-sequitar..... I never said I believed in anything, in fact I said I made 'no determination'...therefore why are you acting this way? Frankly you're just acting silly, because I'm not in favor of Bush's actions. Please don't assume that your tactics of arguement can apply like a paint brush, because not all people are of the same wool. Wow, you're an asshole. Never had I wanted to prove anything to you, I just want to rationally communicate ideas with you, so that you may have more knowledge to chew on...whether it turns out to be as true as it's said to be or not. I didn't imagine you would act like a moron, but I guess I could see that coming from the behaviour you commonly come-up with.
The fact that you're non-religious makes me want to become religious. No, scratch that. It makes me want to become the next Pope.
I believe the words "imminent threat" were used... pretty much implying... Many governments will go along with whatever the US tells them to. Why should I trust them any more than a lying cowboy? Not all of my comments were directed at you - they were directed at those calling 20 year old mustard gas WMD...
Funny how someone made that assertion durning the meeting, and then was flatly embarassed as his betters (ie chemical experts) informed him that there was no comparison. Tell me, does it pay to be a biased moron? It's not as though I'm supporting Bush here, I'm just keeping an open and unbiased view of the landscape. And while all the chemical experts present seemed rather interested, and would like to see the full report,...a common-sense individual would keep an open mind and see it through. Perhaps it's nothing, but behaving like an asshole doesn't help anything.
Sounds like you just told the enemy about secret government programs. That's treason gtech... you're a traitor to your country!
Fair enough. So did many democrats...so as long as your view is even, atleast it's fair. I remember watching the vote, and I knew where it was going, and I think all the politician whom gave Bush the right to force were either delude or just not mindful of their actions....or maybe in with Bush. According to the Generals, most of the weapons were designed for Sarin, as Mustard gas weighs more than air, and sometimes rolls back on troops in combat...thus was good in the first war when we were on the ground, but stupid in mainstream war. Sarin was in the majority, and according to the General there's no definitive understanding on how Sarin degrades over time...but he assert that anything over 1% is deadly if exposed long enough. While that doesn't assert anything about the exact toxicity, the generals remained prudent on giving that info, since they requested to discuss that in closed sessions. They claimed that certain information would put solidiers at danger...I'm assuming because he claims there's most likely more to come. And he even asserted there was roughly 500 more, which are yet to be unclassified.
Incorrect again. Sure am making a lot of corrections for you today. Bush derangement syndrome is in overload: Not even an implication of "imminent threat." BTW, the *Some* he was mentioning were angry liberals. Gotta love the irony there! The lies of the left never cease to amaze me.
Here's the actual words "The security of our country is the commitment of both political parties, and the responsibility of both the President and the Congress. We are united in our determination to confront this urgent threat to America. " "We're moving toward a strong resolution authorizing the use of force, if necessary, to defend our national security interests against the threat posed by Saddam Hussein" "The danger to our country is grave and it is growing." So he didn't say "imminent threat" ... my apology.. he just said "urgent threat", "threat posed by saddam", and "grave danger" ... these are all very different than imminent threat
Incorrect again. I can't recall a single day where I have had to correct you so often. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/01/20030128-19.html This is the famous "imminent threat" speech that liberals love to misquote the President over. None of the passages which you quoted were from that famous speech. That doesn't preclude that at some point he may have said them, but not in the famous "imminent threat" speech.
Actually i gave you the correct words: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/09/20020928.html Correct yourself
You gave me the words to another speech, but not the imminent threat speech you originally misquoted, as usual. You are corrected
I didn't originally misquote any speech, I gave the quote "immenent threat" and never made any regard as to which speech it was... only that he had said it or something similar. You can nitpick about whatever you want.. the facts remain he said we were in grave danger and that iraq was an urgent threat.... BWahahahahah!!!
I wouldn't doubt anything like that...especially given the quote. It's just politics. I'm more sad over the money consumed.
Yes, that's exactly the way it is, but the other way around. Atleast when we speak about the Palestine conflict. When the palestinans get more power, they create more terrorism, when they get blocked, they shut up. History has told us that. From the Racism conflicts and the creation of Israel to the Great Wall and the so handover of the Gaza strip to the palestinans.
Here we have a classic case of a man who survives on American dollars but is against his own country. Going against one's own country is more unpardonable than rape and murder. Did you know that Islam promotes raping and murdering of non-believers? They just got a dosage of their own teachings.