Those are just presentation so that you can see how the logos will look on your current website.. The final files you get will be the one with the required size of a logo..
hey hazard i like the look of yours but the logo is set to high on the mark, sayasatria yours would place more for a tv tube and does not rep. a review site. Hipstick like what you were going for but may be to busy for what my readers actually look at. These are good - as for the simple ones at the top of page two they dont fit the overal theme or goal, our design is more grunge and we have decided to stay away from the shiny old web 2.0 day's look. I got a pm saying that the text limits really have a top side logo. I agree so side type logos are accepted as well with name and slogan under it and we will just rebuild the header to fit this.
to bennyjh - i put my two cents in on the whole "shiny" "web 2.0" style logos as those are not my goal, to hazard and saya. these i like but to both the G is a mark that reminds me of google and i do not need to piss off that giant since they are the ones who's profits are paying for this as for hazard shift the words more center and the "dice" somehow to stand out to saya. make the g more away from a google look or make it work with GSTV also they both don't have the right "scheme" in color for the words it almost stands out to much for the design. I am looking to annouce either close or a winner pretty quick so please let me know.