You are in no position to question my integrity as it is you who has lost your integrity if you ever had one by supporting a crooked administration that has lied and keeps lying to the American people on so many different levels. It makes me sick and sad. Over 70% of American disapprove of the job this administration is doing the list is long and keeps getting longer. For us to turn a blind eye to the crooks that are running our country to the ground is unAmerican. So I consider you not a patriot but a coward and an ignorant for operating on blind faith and constantly bluring the truth with your right wing propaganda.
There you go again, letting blind hatred interfere with logical thought. Work on your integrity. Lying over and over again is not justified by hatred for someone (Bush). WMD were found, ties to alqaida were found. It is not appropriate to lie and say otherwise, no matter how much hatred you have for Bush. Hatred does not excuse a lack of integrity. Integrity is earned. You are not entitled to it.
Are you still living under a rock? Where the hell are the weapons of mass destruction? Where are the links? You are so brainwashed.
And you Gtech may go to where you came from...the deep dark hole of ignorance where you can live the rest of your pathetic life holding hands with Bush and Cheney and the rest of the crooked gang that have brought shame to this country and divided it.
I love it! bu, bu, bu, but there were no wmds! Well, only 500, plus all those that were looted and the chemical wmd found in Iraq last year and all the materials found to start up projects again. Bu, bu, bu, but those don't count!
Some matters should stay private, especially when they are completely legal. The financial tracking of terrorists was on a strictly limited basis with plenty of oversight. The Supreme Court has established that. People who think the papers have a right to publish ANYTHING are ridiculous. What would you guys do if the NYTimes published the names of all CIA agents? Your home address, phone number, credit cards???
They also found a nuclear cetrifcal machine needed to create a nuclear bomb in a back yard in Iraq. S'pos that dont count too.
they were going to use that for um,.. mouthwash, err I mean an x-ray machine. Ya, it was an x-ray machine. geesh for medical use
oh ny times is treason because it protects the bill of rights, and all basic freedoms that are entitled to every single american. Why is it that all of you people just jump on the conservative bandwaggon without actually analyzing the situation. Your freedoms are being attempted to be restricted, which is entirely against the constitution and bill of rights. I can't wait until we all have national ID cards and curfews and unjust military tribunal trials, like all you people want. They're trying to deliver to you what hitler delivered to the german people, and you are all soooooo willing to fall in line, into the goose step and henry where do you think that intelligence came from, how did iraqis get the nuclear development technology, oh and not to mention about 50% of their chemical weapons, the US government.
It had absoutely nothing what-so-ever to do with these things at all, nor is that what they were doing. The NYT was not looking out for basic freedoms, which were not at issue. They were looking out (again) for the best interests of terrorists. Not only misleading, but completely fabricated and dishonest. The NYT is treasonous because it took a secret, legal program that had congressional oversight that was used (successfully) to fight the enemies of our country and the treasonous actions they took, in serving the best interests of terrorists, has already caused the program harm. *This* is why the NYT is treasonous. Willing to sell their country out for a Pulitzer. Bill of rights and basic freedoms of Americans had no role in it. It's not a Bush issue, nor a republican vs democrat issue, it's an American issue. I haven't seen any congressional or senate democrats defend the NYT's treason, which is actually a little awkward. But a refreshing change.
Definition of terrorism United States Department of Defense – The calculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological." United States Department of Justice – Involves violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State, or that would be a criminal violation if committed within the jurisdiction of the United States or any State; Appears to be intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or to affect the conduct of a government by assassination or kidnapping; and occur totally outside the United States, or transcend national boundaries in terms of the means by which they are accomplished, the persons they appear intended to coerce or intimidate, or the locale in which their perpetrators operate or seek asylum. Terrorism The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that President Bush overstepped his authority in ordering military war crimes trials for Guantanamo Bay detainees. The ruling, a rebuke to the administration and its aggressive anti-terror policies, was written by Justice John Paul Stevens, who said the proposed trials were illegal under U.S. law and international Geneva conventions. 5-3 ruling says military trials would violate U.S. law, Geneva Conventions Do you mean that NYT was looking out for the best interest of Bush and his administration?
Terrorism : The calculated use of violence (or threat of violence) against civilians in order to attain goals that are political or religious or ideological in nature; this is done through intimidation or coercion or instilling fear. - - or: The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.
Isn't this what Bush is doing to both civilians and different countries? It is called state terrorism.
No, it means they were looking out for your buds. Makes you want to rush out and get a NYT subscription, eh?
You must be thinking of zarqawi. No wait, that couldn't be, because the only bad thing you've ever said about any terrorist was: "a piece of shit and assholes!" while under extreme duress! What's wrong gworld, did you get bored bashing dmoz everyday? Do you miss bashing America, Christians, Jews, Soldiers and anything not related to seeking virgins?
I quote the definition of terrorism according to US government and it seems a perfect fit for describing this administration, if you have nothing to say then you don't need to get upset and post nonsense.