YOUR bailout cut

Discussion in 'General Chat' started by SearchBliss, Feb 2, 2009.

0
  1. #1
    SearchBliss, Feb 2, 2009 IP
  2. effektz

    effektz Active Member

    Messages:
    474
    Likes Received:
    4
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    60
    #2
    It seems like 9700 for each person would stimulate the economy a lot better ;)
     
    effektz, Feb 2, 2009 IP
  3. Elvos

    Elvos Active Member

    Messages:
    175
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    53
    #3
    not really because after we spend that 9700 dollars then the economy will still be bad and have problems..
     
    Elvos, Feb 2, 2009 IP
  4. SearchBliss

    SearchBliss Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,899
    Likes Received:
    70
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    195
    Digital Goods:
    1
    #4
    Well we'd be better off, rather then the banks, companies, etc., "holding and spending" the money without any stipulations.
     
    SearchBliss, Feb 2, 2009 IP
  5. *Tauren*

    *Tauren* Peon

    Messages:
    48
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    I am not an economist, but I would have to agree...
     
    *Tauren*, Feb 2, 2009 IP
  6. SearchBliss

    SearchBliss Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,899
    Likes Received:
    70
    Best Answers:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    195
    Digital Goods:
    1
    #6
    I second that!
     
    SearchBliss, Feb 2, 2009 IP