DMOZ 2.0 & the AOL staff...

As you well know, Ivan, because you keep doing it! we are on a hiding to nothing, you could have taken thousands in bribes, removed good sites, mucked up ontology, refused many times to listen to warnings and can still come on here claiming you did nothing pleading for confidentiality clause to be lifted when you know very well....

than for the matter to be discussed any further in public or in private.

 

Doing what?

Then why is it so hard to post few proofs?

Ah so gworld is troll without proof but when it comes to me it is enough for you to say it to become possibility? Do we have a lawyer here? Is this enough for slander?

WTF? Do you really want to get sued? My logs are visible to anyone in DMOZ as well as public so you are free to check for all the sites I've removed!

What????

What warnings??? I got single warning (true that is one more then some other much more deserving editors got).

Well if metas are so keen on hiding the TRUTH that will only make me even more persistent.

 

Ivan, as you well know the matter will not be discussed in public or in private, my comment was to say you COULD, we would never be told, but you or anyone can come on here claim false dismissal with the very, VERY secure knowledge that no member of ODP will contradict you or offer information. As it is I have as much access as you do to that information, because I have NO access to it.

 

Actually ODP staff aren't discuss too much on public and maybe is best way to keep the community strong , *( its somewhat similar with google algorithms of ranking - if everyone will know all things involved there all sites will be pr 10 and number one in google for any keyword ) SO ... its ok to have a closed community where peoples who enter have to follow some rules and so on ... important its for those peoples who are already IN this community to follow the rules which they claim to be followed always ! Funny fact its seems this rules aren't respected !

 

What is the quote below them.... trolling?

 

Honestly I would like to know so I could finally put whole thing behind me, some editor were shown enough decency and told of the precise reason no matter how ridiculously it sounded so informations do leak from meta forum on case by case basis, obviously I'm not one of those cases.

I have no doubt metas are keeping all informations on need to know basis, one day they might even remove you for some weird reason understandable to them alone.

 

Wow, wonder if he's heard of "Time Warner" . What an excellent choice of Technical Project Manager... someone who never even heard of it while working there 10 years exploring "every corner of the company" lol.

 

At least then I would get to bed much earlier and get some sleep instead of editing till the early hours many nights.