Need A Reciprocal link Checker Tool

Hello All
Recently I have done 100s of directory submission,now i want to check whether my link is live ot not?So please suggest a tool with the help of which i can do it.Please suggest a tool which can find link in inner pages of websites also.

 

Well, webconfs is one of my favourite SEO sites, so here is thier checker:
http://www.webconfs.com/reciprocal-link-checker.php

 

Learn python, then link checking is so easy it only takes 4 lines of code and a txt file full of urls

 

Webconfs is my favorite online SEO tool site.

 

Thank you all..I have tried all of these..but these tool only check link on the url specified but not in its inner pages

 

I don't think there is any program/site/script that does that.

 

if you've done it by hand, I can understand why you might want to check, to see how much of it 'took'.

If you did it automatically, why do you even care? Spend your time creating MORE backlinks, not checking old ones.

And finally, if you really ARE doing it by hand, I fear your experience of internet marketing won't be very rewarding.

 

Nice tools thanks for sharing!!!

 

hello,

I m totally agree with rsrikanth05.

 

Thanks a lot guys

 

try seo elite ... great soft ware.. i use it all the time and gets everything

 

Been building something and this link checker tool is already finished.
Still the site isn't fully completed but you can try using it.

www.webcheckerpro.com

 

Nice, but it doesn't seem to check innner pages...

 

hi,
i think these both tools are good

www.webconfs.com/reciprocal-link-checker.php
www.recip-links.com

 

Thanks a lot for posting 2 links that were already there...

 

You might find this one useful to check the reciprocal link checker. I haven't personally tried it, but just saw it in the list.

http://tools.khrido.com/webtools/reciprocal-link-checker.aspx

 

Whats the point? Most directory links are junk. Us an automated submission tool to track your submissions for you. This is not reciprocal link checking. And reciprocal link checking is a complete waste of time. Most of the software that is designed to check for links is junk. There are many reasons why it may fail to report links with any accuracy.

Submit your links. Respond to the emails you get. Then move on and forget about it.

 

Why? You can not change it anyway.

Oh, you really think you are going to get a link from everyone. If you ask for a 1000 links this month, you might get lucky to get 500. But next month, there will only be 250. In six months, there will only be 100. And of these, 99 will be on undexed/graybarred pages. The one you did get, it's on a PR0 page.

But you still have the 1,000 link on your site. Right!

Save the time and energy and look for that one or two PR2 links. It will pass more page rank that all of the 1,000 links above, fit within the Google requirements and takes nothing but asking people you work with for a link. Just put it on the correct page, don't screw each other and make sure that the anchor text is proper SEOed.

Oh, no reciprocal link checker checks for javaScript links, nofollow links or broken links. And I mean above the link page. Start at the home page, work your way down to your link page. Are they proper <a> type links? Oh, an image link???????

Ok, then lets say that they are perfect links. Now apply cloaking. What you see, is not what the SEs index. Bye bye links.

Forget about getting a reciprocal link checker tool, just add Sig links to this forum and you will be 1000 times ahead. Just SEO the anchor text of the SIG links.

 

At last I have got thanks for the links ...

 

It's crazy to state that a reciprocal links checker is a waste of time. Why?

Because in my case I reciprocate with very high quality sites from their PR pages. As often as I can, I get on their front pages. It's slower, but as has been mentioned, its far more effective.

Doing 3 way links via quality sites is rankings gold and to suggest keeping track of those is a waste of time ( when you could be building more sites ) shows a lack of understanding of the process.