We heard about many celebs. now a days adopt children from various nationlity. But the question is they have their own children then why they adopt other? Why they not sponsered the children than adopt them? Share your viwes.
They want to appear magnanimous. You could sponsor 10000 kids with money and not get the same positive press coverage they receive from 1 adoption. For proof, consider Bill and Melinda Gates vs Angelina Jolie
Probably because they just do not want to put only money...they also want to put in their effort for good cause...as well Giving just money to orphan houses and Raising a life on your own alongside you, are vastly different. Regards, RightMan
Its for publicity, the celebs dont look after those adopted children, nannies do, they pose coming out of their homes with the children, suggesting they care for them, its lies though. They know it will cause copycat adoptions too, its probably some sort of racket and a sinister trade in children going on underneath the surface. Takes your attention from the real dark trade in people worldwide too, children that get trafficked, modern day slavery. If your busy watching the celebs you wont be so bothered by the real dodgy things going on. See how they distract people.
This may be called as desire for good deeds while it can be desire for huge publicity too... 50 50 chances of both things.... as everyone do everything with different thoughts in minddd
oo yesss, i know many girls are scared getting pragnent and bear the pain atleast it is the figh in between death and life, when a women going through in, thats why God put a heaven under the feet of mum
& i heard many women say that becoming mother was the most incredible feeling of their life..!! so, was all that crap..??
It probably IS wonderful and incredible, but it's still scary before you've actually done it. Plus movie stars don't want to risk getting stretch marks and varicose veins. Adoption is nothing new among movie stars; it's not just nowadays. Actually, I always wanted to adopt, but I wouldn't feel right about taking a child out of their native country even if they truly were orphans with no known living relatives. Where I live, a lot kids get put in care because their parents can't afford to feed them, but they don't really want to give them up permanently. Apparently that's what happened with Angelina Jolie's kid.