1. Advertising
    y u no do it?

    Advertising (learn more)

    Advertise virtually anything here, with CPM banner ads, CPM email ads and CPC contextual links. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

    Starts at just $1 per CPM or $0.10 per CPC.

Review my home-site: www.tadej-ivan.be (compare two designs)

Discussion in 'Websites' started by tayiper, May 11, 2006.

  1. #1
    Please, I ask you if you could review my home-site's design, i.e. the one that I currently use compare to the 3-column fully CSS-based layout (the one with all the "standard boxes", i.e. with Header, Content and Footer), that I was planning to use for a very long time now ...


    As first, here are the two important my home-site's links: http://users.volja.net/tayiper (opens the "index.html" page), http://users.volja.net/tayiper/intro.html (the "intro" page, opens after 38 seconds); the site is about various computing-related stuff and it's written in XHTML and W3C-valid. But note that only "locally" in the original form (as it is stored on my hard-disk), because the code that some of the free-host add unfortunately screws the otherwise valid syntax ...


    And as second, here is first a link to a thread that I've opened yesterday on the DP under the "HTML & Website Design" section (and CSS sub-section): Problems with a 3-column CSS-based layout. In it, you can find the links to the second type of design, i.e. as mentioned, a 3-column layout with Header, Content, and Footer boxes. /UPDATE: Well, here I am posting one of the three links from that thread anyway: http://users.volja.net/tayiper/index-example-2.html (style-file: http://users.volja.net/tayiper/layout-example-2.css)


    So as an addition to any web-coding related feedback (ad-placement, general site-coding etc.), I am asking you: if you compare both designs, do you think it's worth a hassle to "convert" my site into it, or my current site's design is good enough ??


    Thanks in advance, tayiper
     
    tayiper, May 11, 2006 IP
  2. rickvidallon

    rickvidallon Peon

    Messages:
    147
    Likes Received:
    6
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #2
    I think #2 is an improvement.
     
    rickvidallon, May 11, 2006 IP
  3. HenrikAI

    HenrikAI Peon

    Messages:
    73
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #3
    I agree, go for #2.
     
    HenrikAI, May 12, 2006 IP
  4. socotroco

    socotroco Peon

    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #4
    I also vote for #2. The background in #1 makes me dizzy. Also, you shoud try to improve the image quality for the links you have on top of the page.
     
    socotroco, May 12, 2006 IP
  5. AmyNelson

    AmyNelson Peon

    Messages:
    574
    Likes Received:
    11
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #5
    The bright blue links are a bit harsh against the black background, but 2 is far better.
     
    AmyNelson, May 12, 2006 IP
  6. limitedwarranty

    limitedwarranty Peon

    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    1
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #6
    #2 is far better, it could be improved some, but if #1 is the alternative it is 100% better!

    And dont let the background image from #1 make its way into #2 it gives me a headache to try to read text over an image expecially an image the same color as the text.
     
    limitedwarranty, May 12, 2006 IP
  7. tayiper

    tayiper Active Member

    Messages:
    421
    Likes Received:
    3
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    78
    #7
    I forgot to note in my original/opening post that my entire site's design (as it is now) is entirely my idea; though of course, I am not saying that it's something special, not at all ...


    tayiper
     
    tayiper, May 12, 2006 IP