Different Algorithms are being used - that are COMPLETELY Distinct Which one do you prefer? Have you begun Optimizing for what may be 1/4 of all Search Engine Users How does your current ones compare to the Beta
Beta is much better; closer in line with google, but duplicate domains (2 domains going to 1 site) seems to get you double listings.
I like the beta much better then the current search. Nowhere to be found in the current search but show up in the beta. Not near as high as Google but better.
I very much prefer the beta. I'm about 123rd in the current search but I'm #1 in beta. It appears the beta weights keyword relevance much higher than google or yahoo.
WhooHoo, much better than even Google for my 5 star site, have not checked the rest yet, but that's the one that matters.
I prefer and am doing better in the Beta version. I'm happy to see that they are showing the cache too.
How do you submit a site to msn or the msn beta? All I can find now are the paid inclusion for the msn business . . . .
Does that make them hard to spam? I don't think so... We are talking about the algo to rank the pages, not the speed at which pages are ranked.
I agree, but I have to say that the fact that they regularly update doesn't make them hard to spam. I've seen some really interesting results from this SE. It looks (For some searches anyway), that there is some kind of TSPR thing going on. So the anchor text may not be taken into the equation, but the page the link is displayed on is...