If it comes down to these two data centers which one from your own point of view provides the most relevant results, and this is from a Seo point of view and just a regular user of Google. Thanks
66.102.9.104 seems to me to be the most relevant, both as a user and for the fact that it shows results closer to what I would expect for my SEO efforts. I still see alot of irrelevant results in both datacenters. I do hope neither one is final.
For me, it's sad to say that yahoo and msn are more relevant then anything in jagger3. If I were interested in buying boxes that the wholesalers I buy from use to pack their products, or to know who they use as a advertising agent, GOOGLE would be the choice Search Engine. If I wanted to buy the products the wholesalers actually sell, it's MSN or yahoo.
lol, funny how everyones sites are ranking on the 7 one... We will have a fit if that one doesn't stick
it seems like the disparity between the 2 is one focuses on internal links, the other on external links. that's the only thing I can trace by monitoring a few keywords.
I have to agree as well. I rank 33 on 66.102.7.104 and 178 on .9. I have been in the sandbox for almost a year and am just beginning to move up. I hope 66.102.7.104 sticks around. Keeping my fingers crossed
Matt Cutts says the 9.104 is the one. For me that is just crap because on my keywords (adult) it is full of spam on the 9.104 and besides the spam only authority sites are listed. Went from position #3 to #11.
The final results are going to be a mixture of the two of them ultimately. 66.102.7.104 does not seem to have the canonical url issue resolved. I am seeing some different results beyond that... I like 66.102.7.104 for some reasons, but I like 66.102.9.104 for others. So I will look forward to when the two meet.
I do prefer the results in 66.102.9.104, much more related and less spammy then the 7 one... Also, Matt says that jagger3 is now visible in the 9 one.
7 seems more normal SERPs, are almost the same serps for me, actually, for me are the same as the normal results. In 9 I see too important and nonsense changes. I would say the nine offers old results, very old. I have been monitoring two sites, which are growing and growing, and 9 shows me the same results as on october-september. This explains the nonsense changes. I would say also Matt is playing with us.