How Google Judge the Authority of your website? 1. Age of your domain 2. Internal linking 3. Number of pages indexed 4. Inbound links 5. Links out to websites Natural link balance and I always recommend (80/20 split) · 80% anchor text links · 20% naked links I guess you should know that links from higher ranked websites like Page rank 6 & 7 websites is just great for authority link building. Link building is an important aspect of SEO. You want to get your website on Google Page never ever miss out link building. How Google Judges your backlinking? How many “good sites†are linking to your website? That’s the big question you should answer Google. Great ways to build these backlinks are with LINK WHEELS. Another great way to build backlinks is with LINK PYRAMIDS. Please don’t ask me what is link wheel and link pyramid, if you don’t know just Google it. Just as simple as that… Most of the Internet marketers out there will never waste their time doing SEO works and link building works. For an example, I always get people from Fiverr.com to build link wheels and link pyramids. I will than arrange them with SENUKE and other software. To make things easier for you let me tell you what you could (should) outsource on Fiverr.com · Link wheels and link pyramids · Social bookmarking · Backlinking to EDU. Links · Autoposting to sites for you · Find people who can do Angela style backlinks · Find people who own/use SENuke. Scrapebox,Xrummer · Article writing and posting · RSS feed submission · Press release writing and submission
Once I reached.... You lost all credibility; the value of a backlink is based on quality and relevancy, not Pagerank. Did you really say Find people who own/use SENuke, Scrapebox and Xrummer... you think spamming the internet for backlinks is what Google wants? Avoid this stuff at all costs.
One more thing I would like to add: In one of Google’s announcement it was said that content with a “small amount of visible content above-the-fold or relevant content persistently (being) pushed down by ads.†As an analogy, think about the difference between a free local paper and one you pay for. The one you pay for is always better, right? Partly because the front page is not obscured by some huge ad for a bathroom or carpet company.Google’s logic here is sound. Show people the sites that give them what they are looking for above the fold. Therefore, the advice for anyone is to take a cold look at your site through the eyes of a visitor. Are you giving them what they want or are you forcing them to see what you want?
Software like SENUke, Scrapebox and Xrummer are not spamming tools, only users whom using those software are spamming. When you use the software appropriately the will give you the best results. And i will tell that you will be wasting your time using manual ways to do SEO works. Though i accept manual link building strategies will be for long term compare to software usage...
Did you really just say they aren't spamming tools only the people using them are spammers? Any type of program or method that automatically posts content and links is consider spamming in the eyes of Google; end of story. It's people like you that send others in the wrong direction, quality links over quantity ANY-DAY is better off-page optimization.
Guess you are seriously new to SEO and link building... Software are meant to make things easier and not to bring you to greater heights than manual link builders. Most of the SEO companies and consultants will use the software to get things done easier.. So if you want to do manual SEO and link building it's gonna take time and huge effort and meanwhile others whom are using software will be thinking of new ideas to leverage their online business
It appears you're the new guy if you think automation is the way to go. FYI, you don't classify SEO and link building as two separate entities, link building is a part of off-page search engine optimization. What also is interesting is you try to tie Pagerank as a way to value links; when it's about relevancy and quality. All of my sites in my portfolio and sites I've worked with were ranked via manual link building; shall we compare our results in a private message to see who had the "greater heights". I'm calling you out. No respectable SEO company would admit to using automated software nor should they use it; considering once again it's spamming and I shall repeat.... link quality over quantity.
It doesn't mean you can never have quality link building through software usage... It depends on how you use them.. I'm not here to argue with you whether i'm greater or you're greater.. I'm just sharing information. If you can't take it and if you have other ideas that's good. I never even tell my ways are the best. If you keep thinking it is spamming let it be so.. no offence..
Unless you can prove otherwise the answer is still no, you cannot build quality links through automated software; EOR.
Google specially check two things for page rank one the content of the page and the second is quality back links for this page.
*sigh* Does anyone know what they are talking about in this sub-forum anymore? Wrong; I suggest your read the Wikipedia Article on Pagerank and learn about it before you try to educate people on it.
I think Google judges your website according to three main points: amount of quality content, your link profile and visitor behavior & engagement on your site. However, we don't need to argue about theories because we have something better instead: evidence. Yes, evidence! Just google something like, oh, say, seo company. Download the link profiles of the top ranking sites and what do you see? They are buying high PR links, they are using spun content, they are building 'unnatural' link profiles. Yet they are ranking on page one in a niche that has ever geek at google watching them. Think about that. Do you think Matt Cutts and the spam team at Google have never looked at the SERPS for "seo company"? They know what is going on and they certainly aren't ignorant or stupid. They can look at any one of those top ranking seo sites and flunk it for paid links and other well known transgressions - but they don't.
It was a massive argument between ContentVisionz and Premierwebstrategies. I agree with Premierwebstrategies. Quality back links matter, Its not like you can build thousands links within a minute and expect good results if you're not adding something useful you'll not get any reputation in Google's eye. If you want to spam and add garbage to the web you're obviously invited to use automated softwares.
I never even talked about quality vs quantity of back links and it's just so obvious quality back links plays vital role compare to the quantity of back links. I'm just suggesting using software makes your back linking work done easily compared to manual way of building links.I don't know whether others just use the software for just spamming. For me i use the software appropriately. Thanks...