It goes without saying that I want ThinkBling.com to be in the top SERPs for the word bling. My question is, how can my site not even appear in the top ten when the following page is number 10 with only 2 backlinks? http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=bling&f=1
Search "allinanchor:bling", your site seems not be in first several pages. By the way, what does "bling" mean?
My reference to bling is kind of like swag, or merchandise. That's not what it really means. Mainly it is just an annoying term that is supposed to cause rememberability. I realize that there are numerous factors about getting into the SERPs but I thought that my site would beat out another that only has 2 backlinks. Today I am 51st for an "allinanchor:bling" search.
Back links are displayed very randomly, you can't simply judge a site by it. The most important factor is allinanchor:keyword ranking, you may search it and compare your site with others, if you want to enter the first page, your allinanchor ranking should be in the first page, otherwise try to build more links with proper anchor text.
Forget the 'allinanchor: it ain't working right, try inanchor: which is in fact (I have been told from a reliable source) the correct operator. I had a look and can't see thinkbling in the top 4 pages, so it loooks like the old story of more links batman
Very interesting, I thought allinanchor:keyword was similar with allinanchor:"keyword". allinanchor and inanchor are the same for two old sites, for the new site dvd-software.info(should be in sandbox now) is very different, allinanchor is #8, inanchor isn't even in the SERPs(same as real search), didn't test other sites, according to the 3 results, inanchor seems to only count credited links. Thanks for the interesting info.
I have seen mention of the term allinanchor before, but I don't think I've every seen inanchor mentioned before. Where can I find an explanation of the difference.