1. Advertising
    y u no do it?

    Advertising (learn more)

    Advertise virtually anything here, with CPM banner ads, CPM email ads and CPC contextual links. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

    Starts at just $1 per CPM or $0.10 per CPC.

Google WHOIS Hacked??

Discussion in 'Google' started by sixty6, Dec 11, 2006.

  1. #1
    http://www.whois.org/whois_new.cgi?d=google&tld=com

    I just saw this on Digg and thought it was another classic joke! Take a look at what the WHOIS information says, just in case they change it in the future:

    This is so odd, can anyone tell me what's going on?
     
    sixty6, Dec 11, 2006 IP
  2. sixty6

    sixty6 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,748
    Likes Received:
    68
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    190
    #2
    just a small inclusion, this is not the same result in all WHOIS results, just this one for some reason :confused:
     
    sixty6, Dec 11, 2006 IP
  3. Correctus

    Correctus Straight Edge

    Messages:
    3,453
    Likes Received:
    389
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    195
    #3
    Probably people at the Whois server sold modification rights to these people.

    Afterall its their data, and the actual data is nowhere changed

    IT
     
    Correctus, Dec 11, 2006 IP
  4. sixty6

    sixty6 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,748
    Likes Received:
    68
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    190
    #4
    I don't understand, what does that mean? The registry was altered by someone?
     
    sixty6, Dec 11, 2006 IP
  5. Correctus

    Correctus Straight Edge

    Messages:
    3,453
    Likes Received:
    389
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    195
    #5
    Not the actual registry

    You see the whois server YOU are checking Google's whois on is a private server that takes the official data from ICANN or the registrars and then makes it available for the general public on their own servers.

    Now, the owners of this whois server sold modification rights to the Google whois record ON THEIR server to someone else, so that person altered it in this way, it is also very probable that the Whois server people did this themselves for a joke of some kind

    Hope you have understood now

    IT
     
    Correctus, Dec 11, 2006 IP
  6. LucasMS

    LucasMS Peon

    Messages:
    616
    Likes Received:
    11
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
  7. frisby

    frisby Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,378
    Likes Received:
    39
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    140
    #7
    Insted of showing the real whoisa data you show something what you want to show.
     
    frisby, Dec 11, 2006 IP
  8. NevDull

    NevDull Peon

    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    0
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #8
    Someone registered a nameserver with the root servers under each of those domains, and some whois clients don't do an exact match.

    You'll find the same thing if you whois microsoft.com or any of thousands of other domains with the same whois tool.
     
    NevDull, Dec 11, 2006 IP
  9. Icheb

    Icheb Peon

    Messages:
    1,092
    Likes Received:
    31
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #9
    Man, are you people really that stupid? That page doesn't give you a whois record for that domain. THIS is a whois record. The whois.org tool just shows you domains from their cache that have the string "google.com" in them.
     
    Icheb, Dec 12, 2006 IP
  10. Diddy1

    Diddy1 Peon

    Messages:
    295
    Likes Received:
    13
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #10
    That is just plain stupid. Changing one whois site for a joke? Must really hate google.

    Thank You
     
    Diddy1, Dec 12, 2006 IP
  11. LucasMS

    LucasMS Peon

    Messages:
    616
    Likes Received:
    11
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #11
    and is much more easy to hack that website than a whois of a domain..
     
    LucasMS, Dec 12, 2006 IP
  12. T0PS3O

    T0PS3O Feel Good PLC

    Messages:
    13,219
    Likes Received:
    777
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #12
    Great bit of Link Bait by some clever fellow Dutchies.
     
    T0PS3O, Dec 12, 2006 IP
  13. sixty6

    sixty6 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,748
    Likes Received:
    68
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    190
    #13
    So does that mean he's wrong:

    Does that mean any domain name can get in there?
     
    sixty6, Dec 12, 2006 IP
  14. Icheb

    Icheb Peon

    Messages:
    1,092
    Likes Received:
    31
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    #14
    Yes, because it's not a whois record. I can't make that any clearer for those folks here who don't want to understand that. It's simply the domains they have in their cache that contain the string "google.com". Why that's so difficult to understand is beyond me. :confused:
     
    Icheb, Dec 15, 2006 IP
  15. Correctus

    Correctus Straight Edge

    Messages:
    3,453
    Likes Received:
    389
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    195
    #15
    I get it. I was thinking the other way as I had seen someone selling his highly popular whois database's whois entries publicly and people were buying them. Although only a few damn popular websites' whois entries were up for auction, like Google etc.

    Hmm although Icheb, that thing is meant to be a whois database right? You are saying that they are presenting whois in a wrong manner?

    IT
     
    Correctus, Dec 15, 2006 IP
  16. hereyago

    hereyago Active Member

    Messages:
    389
    Likes Received:
    2
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    53
    #16
    lol that gave me a loaugh
     
    hereyago, Dec 15, 2006 IP
  17. sixty6

    sixty6 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,748
    Likes Received:
    68
    Best Answers:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    190
    #17
    That boldface font helped :p Thanks I get it now!
     
    sixty6, Dec 15, 2006 IP